Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 7, Issue 2, Article 9 (Dec., 2006)
Emine Selcen DARÇIN & Lütfullah TÜRKMEN
A study of prospective Turkish science teachers’   knowledge at the popular biotechnological issues

Previous Contents Next


Results

All responses of the students to biotechnological issues are shown in the following Table 1.

Table1. Responses to the questions relating to knowledge about biotechnology 
(See the appendix for the details of questions)
Questions #
True
Neutral
False
Total

f
%
f
%
f
%
f
%
1
175
90.2
15
7.7
4
2.1
194
100
2
118
60.8
50
25.8
26
13.4
194
100
3
99
51.0
40
20.6
55
28.4
194
100
4
83
42.8
48
24.7
63
32.5
194
100
5
111
57.2
30
15.5
32
16.5
194
100
6
57
29.4
105
54.1
32
16.5
194
100
7
53
27.3
93
47.9
48
24.7
194
100
8
116
59.8
54
27.8
24
12.4
194
100
9
130
67.0
44
22.7
20
10.3
194
100
10
62
32.0
105
54.1
27
13.9
194
100
11
145
74.7
34
17.5
15
7.7
194
100
12
14
7.2
128
66.0
52
26.8
194
100
13
92
47.4
74
38.1
28
14.4
194
100
14
35
18.0
117
60.3
42
21.6
194
100
15
91
46.9
44
22.7
59
30.4
194
100
16
42
21.6
115
59.3
37
19.1
194
100
17
11
5.7
160
82.5
23
11.9
194
100
18
70
36.1
81
41.8
43
22.2
194
100
19
60
30.9
85
43.8
49
25.3
194
100
20
102
52.6
71
36.6
21
10.8
194
100
Average 
83.33
42.93
74.6 5
38.47
35
18.04
194  
100
Average % of true statements
 
49.88
 
31.18
 
17.84
 
100
Average % of false statements
 
35.98
 
45.77
 
18.25
 
100

These general averages  do not correspondence to the real percentage of how the students give the right answers to the statements because the answers of ten of twenty statements are true and the answers of the other ten statements are false.    In the result, the half of the students (49.88%) say “true” the true of ten statements but the percentage of the students said “not true” the true of ten statements was also high (35.98%). In the false statements, 18.25% percent of the students said “false” the false of ten statements but 45.77 % of the students were not sure the false statements “false” or “true”.

After giving the general results of students’ responses to biotechnological issues covering the mean of biotechnology, agricultural biotechnology and benefits, health, environmental biotechnology, and issues, questions are classified under five different areas of biotechnological issues and matters  in Tables 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6.   

 Students’ responses to the questions related to the knowledge of biotechnological issues are shown in the Table 2.

  Table 2. Students’ responses to the questions related to the knowledge of describing biotechnology

Questions #

True

Neutral

False

Total


f

%

f

%

f

%

f

%

1

175

90.2

15

7.7

4

2.1

194

100

2

118

60.8

50

25.8

26

13.4

194

100

13

92

47.4

74

38.1

28

14.4

194

100

17

11

5.7

160

82.5

23

11.9

194

100

 

Most of the students answered first, second and 13th questions (using one-cellular microorganisms, side effects of biotechnological methods, if or not biotechnological methods only transfer genes from one organism to another organism) correctly (90%; 60.8%; and 47.4%, respectively), but 82.5% of students answered  17th question (biotechnology was described as cytogenetics), as neutral. The authors suggest that most of the students have misconception about cytogenetics and biotechnology.  

 Fourth, seventh and fourteenth questions cover agricultural biotechnology and its benefits (Table 3).

Table 3. Students responses to the agricultural biotechnology and its benefits

Questions #

True

Neutral

False

Total

 

f

%

f

%

f

%

f

%

4

83

42.8

48

24.7

63

32.5

194

100

7

53

27.3

93

47.9

48

24.7

194

100

14

35

18.0

117

60.3

42

21.6

194

100

The responses indicate that the knowledge level of the majority of students in the department of science education is below 50% in the statements covering agricultural biotechnology and its benefits.   

Responses to Questions concerning knowledge of human health and pharmacy (Questions of 3rd, 5th, and 11th) were answered “true” by most of the students indicating that they had a good knowledge of these biotech issues (Table 4). On the other hand, the 12th question elicited a neutral response indicating that students had inadequate knowledge of how stem cells were obtained by using biotechnology.

Table 4. Questions related to the knowledge of human health and pharmacy

Questions #

True

Neutral

False

Total

 

f

%

f

%

f

%

f

%

3

99

51.0

40

20.6

55

28.4

194

100

5

111

57.2

30

15.5

32

16.5

194

100

11

145

74.7

34

17.5

15

7.7

194

100

12

14

7.2

128

66.0

52

26.8

 

 

8, 16 and 19th questions refer environment and biotechnology (Table 5).

Table 5. Questions refering to environment and biotechnology

Questions#

True

Neutral

False

Total

 

f

%

f

%

f

%

f

%

8

116

59.8

54

27.8

24

12.4

194

100

16

42

21.6

115

59.3

37

19.1

194

100

19

60

30.9

85

43.8

49

25.3

194

100

The majority of undergraduate science education students (59.8%) estimate correctly to use organic waste for being fuel with biotechnological process. But, almost all students didn’t know genetically modified plants adverse effect biodiversity.

Statements using biotechnology for food production were 6, 9, 10, 15, 18 and 20th questions and the results could be seen in the Table 6.

Table 6. Statements using biotechnology for food production

Questions #

True

Neutral

False

Total

 

f

%

f

%

f

%

f

%

6

57

29.4

105

54.1

32

16.5

194

100

9

130

67.0

44

22.7

20

10.3

194

100

10

62

32.0

105

54.1

27

13.9

194

100

15

91

46.9

44

22.7

59

30.4

194

100

18

70

36.1

81

41.8

43

22.2

194

100

20

102

52.6

71

36.6

21

10.8

194

100

 

It was seen that most of the students did not know anything about using biotechnology for production of organic acids, enzymes, primary products such as carbohydrate, alcohol, amino-acid and ketone. Ninth and fifteenth statements about traditional biotechnology were correctly answered by most of the students; however 52% gave false responses to the use of the yeast.

 


Copyright (C) 2006 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 7, Issue 2, Article 9 (Dec., 2006). All Rights Reserved.