Magnetic force learning with Guided Inquiry and Multiple Representations Model (GIMuR) to enhance students' mathematics modeling ability http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/v17

Albe, V., Venturini, P., & Lascours, J. (2001). Electromagnetic Concepts in Mathematical Representation of Physics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(2), 197–203. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009429400105

Ambrosis, A. De, & Onorato, P. (2013). How can magnetic forces do work? Investigating the problem with students. Physics Education, 48(6), 766. http://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/48/6/766

Angell, C., Kind, P. M., Henriksen, E. K., & Guttersrud, Ø. (2008). An empirical-mathematical modelling approach to upper secondary physics. Physics Education, 43(3), 256–264. http://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/43/3/001

Aydoğdu, B. (2015). Examining preservice science teachers' skills of formulating hypotheses and identifying variables. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 16(1), 1–38.

Bagno, E., & Eylon, B.-S. (1997). From Problem Solving to a Knowledge Structure: An Example From the Domain of Electromagnetism. American Journal of Physics, 65(8), 726. http://doi.org/10.1119/1.18642

Barniol, P., & Zavala, G. (2012). Students ' Difficulties with Unit Vectors and Scalar Multiplication of a Vector. In Physics Education Research (Vol. 118, pp. 115–118). http://doi.org/10.1063/1.3680007

Başkan, Z., Alev, N., & Karal, I. S. (2010). Physics and mathematics teachers' ideas about topics that could be related or integrated. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 1558–1562). Elsevier Ltd. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.235

Buck, G. A., MacIntyre Latta, M. A., & Leslie-Pelecky, D. L. (2007). Learning how to make inquiry into electricity and magnetism discernible to middle level teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(3), 377–397. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-007-9053-8

Challapalli, S. R. C. P., Michelini, M., & Vercellati, S. (2013). Building Formal Thinking with Pupils on Magnetic Phenomena in Conceptual Laboratories. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 946–950. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.308

Cock, M. De. (2012). Representation use and strategy choice in physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8(2). http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020117

Deventer, J. V., & Wittmann, M. C. (2007). Comparing student use of mathematical and physical vector representations. AIP Conference Proceedings, 951, 208–211. http://doi.org/10.1063/1.2820935

Doughty, L., McLoughlin, E., & van Kampen, P. (2014). What integration cues, and what cues integration in intermediate electromagnetism. American Journal of Physics, 82(11), 1093–1103. http://doi.org/10.1119/1.4892613

Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., & Leonard, W. J. (1997). Solving physics problems with multiple representations. The Physics Teacher, 35(5), 270. http://doi.org/10.1119/1.2344681

Dunn, J. W., & Barbanel, J. (2000). One model for an integrated math/physics course focusing on electricity and magnetism and related calculus topics. American Journal of Physics, 68(8), 749. http://doi.org/10.1119/1.19537

Emden, M., & Sumfleth, E. (2014). Assessing students ' experimentation processes in guided inquiry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, (November 2013).

Fatmaryanti, S. D., Suparmi, Sarwanto, & Ashadi. (2015a). Analysis of Magnetism Problems in High School Physics National Exam Based on Concept Required and Student's Science Generic Skills. In International Conference on Science and Science Education.

Fatmaryanti, S. D., Suparmi, Sarwanto, & Ashadi. (2015b). Implementation of guided inquiry in physics learning at purworejo's senior high school. In International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education (Vol. 2015). Salatiga: Universitas Kristen Satiya Wacana.

Fatmaryanti, S. D., Suparmi, Sarwanto, & Ashadi. (2017a). Attainment of students ' conception in magnetic fields by using of direct observation and symbolic language ability Attainment of students ' conception in magnetic fields by using of direct observation and symbolic language ability. Journal of Physics : Conference Series, 909. http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/909/1/012058

Fatmaryanti, S. D., Suparmi, Sarwanto, & Ashadi. (2017b). Student representation of magnetic field concepts in learning by guided inquiry. Journal of Physics: Conf.Series, 795. http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001

Hettmannsperger, R., Mueller, A., Scheid, J., & Schnotz, W. (2015). Developing conceptual understanding in ray optics via learning with multiple representations. Z Erziehungswiss. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-015-0655-1

Hsu, Y., Lai, T., & Hsu, W. (2014). A Design Model of Distributed Scaffolding for Inquiry-Based Learning. Research Science Education, (88). http://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9421-2

Ivanjek, L., Susac, A., Planinic, M., Andrasevic, A., & Milin-Sipus, Z. (2016). Student reasoning about graphs in different contexts. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 010106.
http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010106

Khulthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2007). Guided Inquiry. London: Libraries.

Knight, R. D. (1995). The vector knowledge of beginning physics students. The Physics Teacher, 33(2), 74. http://doi.org/10.1119/1.2344143

Kock, Z., Taconis, R., & Bolhuis, S. (2013). Some Key Issues in Creating Inquiry-Based Instructional Practices that Aim at the Understanding of Simple Electric Circuits, 579–597. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9278-6

Kohl, P. B., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2008). Patterns of multipe representation use by experts and novices during physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 4(1), 1–13. http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010111

Kohl, P. B., Rosengrant, D., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2007). Strongly and weakly directed approaches to teaching multiple representation use in physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 3(1), 1–10. http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010108

Kustusch, M. B. (2011). Student Difficulties with Right Hand Rules in Physics. North Carolina State University.

Kustusch, M. B. (2016). Assessing the impact of representational and contextual problem features on student use of right-hand rules. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1).
http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010102

Majidi, S., & Emden, M. (2013). Conceptualizations of representation forms and knowledge organization of high school teachers in Finland : " magnetostatics ." European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 69–83.

Michelsen, C. (2015). Mathematical modeling is also physics—interdisciplinary teaching between mathematics and physics in Danish upper secondary education. Physics Education, 50(4), 489–494. http://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/50/4/489

Nguyen, N.-L., & Meltzer, D. E. (2003). Initial understanding of vector concepts among students in introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 71(6), 630. http://doi.org/10.1119/1.1571831

Nguyen, N.-L., & Meltzer, D. E. (2005). Visualization Tool for 3-D Relationships and the Right-Hand Rule. The Physics Teacher, 43(3), 155. http://doi.org/10.1119/1.1869425

Nivalainen, V., Asikainen, M. A., & Hirvonen, P. E. (2013). Open Guided Inquiry Laboratory in Physics Teacher. Science Teacher Education, 24, 449–474. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9316-x

Oliver, K. L., & Oesterreich, H. A. (2013). Student-centred inquiry as curriculum as a model for field-based teacher education. Journal Curriculum Studies, 45(October 2014), 37–41. http://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.719550

Pospiech, G. (2012). Modelling Mathematical Reasoning in Physics Education. Science and Education, 21, 485–506. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9396-6

Pritchard, A. (1998). Ways of learning. BMJ : British Medical Journal (Vol. 316). http://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7133.0

Redish, E. F., & Kuo, E. (2015). Language of Physics , Language of Math : Disciplinary Culture and Dynamic Epistemology. Science & Education, 561–590. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9749-7

Saarelainen, M. (2011). Teaching and learning of electric and magnetic fields at the university level. University of Eastern Finland.

Saarelainen, M., Laaksonen, A., & Hirvonen, P. E. (2007). Students' initial knowledge of electric and magnetic fields—more profound explanations and reasoning models for undesired conceptions. European Journal of Physics, 28(1), 51–60. http://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/28/1/006

Samsudin, A., Suhandi, A., Rusdiana, D., Kaniawati, I., & Coştu, B. (2016). Investigating the effectiveness of an active learning based-interactive conceptual instruction (ALBICI) on electric field concept. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(1), 1–41.

Scaife, T. M., & Heckler, A. F. (2010). Student understanding of the direction of the magnetic force on a charged particle. American Journal of Physics, 78(8), 869. http://doi.org/10.1119/1.3386587

Scaife, T. M., & Heckler, A. F. (2011). Interference between electric and magnetic concepts in introductory physics. Physics Education Research, 7(March), 1–11. http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.010104

Sen, S., & Yilmaz, A. (2016). The effect of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning ( POGIL ) on 11th Graders ' conceptual understanding of ... The effect of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning ( POGIL ) on 11th Graders ' conceptual understanding of electrochemistry. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(March), 1–32.

Shin, L. W., & Phang, F. A. (2012). Physics Studies and Generic Attributes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56(Ictlhe), 691–702. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.705

Sund, B. R., & Trowbrigdge, W. L. (1973). Teaching Science by inquiry. United state of America: Bells & Howell Company.

Sunyono, Yuanita, L., & Ibrahim, M. (2015). Supporting Students in Learning with Multiple Representation to Improve Student Mental Models on Atomic Structure Concepts. Science Education International, 26(2), 104–125.

Taasoobshirazi, G., & Farley, J. (2013). A multivariate model of physics problem solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 53–62. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.05.001

Tytler, R., & Hubber, P. (2015). Constructing representations to learn science. In Using Multimodal Representations to Support Learning in the Science Classroom (pp. 159–181). Sense Publishers. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16450-2_9

Waldrip, B., Prain, V., & Carolan, J. (2006). Learning junior secondary science through multi-modal representation. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 11(1), 86–105.

Wenning, C. J. (2011). Experimental Inquiry in Introductory Physics Courses. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 6(2), 2–8.

Wenno, I. H. (2015). The Correlation Study of Interest at Physics and Knowledge of Mathematics Basic Concepts towards the Ability to Solve Physics Problems of 7th Grade Students at Junior High School in Ambon Maluku Province , Indonesia. Education Research International, 2015, 1–6.

Wilcox, B. R., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2016). Open-ended versus guided laboratory activities:Impact on students' beliefs about experimental physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020132. http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020132

Wong, D., Sng, P. P., Ng, E. H., & Wee, L. K. (2011). Learning with multiple representations: an example of a revision lesson in mechanics. Physics Education, 46(2), 178. http://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/46/2/005