 |
Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume
Ling L. Liang, Sufen Chen, Xian Chen, Osman Nafiz Kaya, April Dean Adams, Monica Macklin and Jazlin Ebenezer Assessing preservice elementary teachers views on the nature of scientific knowledge: A dual-response instrument |
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & BouJaoude, S. (1997). An exploratory study of the knowledge base for science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 673-699.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. (2000a). Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665-701.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. (2000b). The influence of the history of science courses on students' views of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 1057-1095.
Aikenhead, G. S. (1987). High-school graduates' beliefs about Science-Technology-Society: Methods and issues in monitoring student views. Science Education, 71, 145-61.
Aikenhead, G. S. (1988). An analysis of four ways of assessing student beliefs about STS topics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 607-29.
Aikenhead, G. S., Fleming, R. W., & Ryan, A. G. (1987). High-school graduates' beliefs about science-technology-society. I. Methods and issues in monitoring student views. Science Education, 71, 145-61.
Aikenhead, G. S., & Ryan, A. G. (1992). The development of a new instrument: Views on science-technology-society (VOSTS). Science Education, 76, 477-491.
Alters, B. J. (1997). Whose nature of science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 39-55.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
Central Association of Science and Mathematics Teachers. (1907). A consideration of the principles that should determine the courses in biology in the secondary schools. School Science and Mathematics, 7, 241-247.
Chen, S. (2006). Development of an instrument to assess views on nature of science and attitudes toward teaching science. Science Education, 90, 803-819.
Cooley, W.W., & Klopfer, L.E. (1961). Manual for the test on understanding science. Princeton, NJ: Education Testing Service.
Cooley, W.W., & Klopfer, L.E. (1963). The Evaluation of specific education innovations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1, 73-80.
Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hatcher, L., & Stepanski, E. J. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for univariate and multivariate statistics. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
Jungwirth, E. (1974). Testing for understanding of the nature of science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 3, 206-210.
Kimball, M. E. (1967). Understanding the nature of science: A comparison of scientists and science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5, 110-120.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331-359.
Lederman, N. G. (1998). The state of science education: Subject matter without content. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3, 1-12.
Lederman, N. G. (2004). Syntax of nature of science within inquiry and science instruction. In L. B. Flick and N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 301-317). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497V521.
Lederman, N. G., & O'Malley, M. (1990). Students' perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change. Science Education, 74, 225-239.
McComas, W. (1998). The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies (pp. 53-70). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
McComas, W., & Olson, J. (1998). The nature of science in international science education standards documents. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 41-52). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Meichtry, Y.J. (1992). Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: Data from a case of curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 389-407.
National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
National Research Council. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2005). How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Science Teachers Association (2000). NSTA position statement: The nature of science. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What ideas-about-science should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692-720.
Rubba, P. A. (1977). The development, field testing and validation of an instrument to assess secondary school students understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Indiana.
Rubba, P.A., & Andersen H.O. (1978). Development of an instrument to assess secondary students understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 62, 449-458.
Rubba, P. A., Schoneweg Bradford, C., & Harkness, W. J. (1996). A new scoring procedure for the views on science-technology-society instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 387-400.
Ryan, A. G., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1992). Students preconceptions about the epistemology of science. Science Education, 76, 559-580.
Tsai, C. VC., & Liu, S. -Y. (2005). Developing a multi-dimensional instrument for assessing students epistemological views toward science, International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1621-1638.
Vazquez-Alonso, A., & Manassero-Mas, M.-A. (1999). Response and scoring models for the views on science-technology-society instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 231-247.
Welch, W. W. (1966). Welch science process inventory, Form D. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Copyright (C) 2008 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 9, Issue 1, Article 1 (Jun., 2008). All Rights Reserved.
