Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 7, Issue 2, Article 10 (Dec., 2006)
Behiye AKCAY
The analysis of how to improve student understanding of the nature of science: A role of teacher 

Previous Contents Next


Research indicate that teacher conceptions of NOS does affect instructional strategies that they use

Science teachers need to recognize importance of  NOS and how it relates to science teaching if they are to help students completely understand the content and underlying philosophy of science (Palmquist & Finley, 1997). This is important because science teachers should decide how to teach the scientific information and how that information became known and related to a particular view of the NOS. 

Lederman (1992) analyzed the interactions between teachers’ understandings of NOS, their classroom practices, their actual curriculum structure, and how they all impact student understanding.  Similar analyses were examined by Larson (2000) with chemistry classroom teachers. He tried to determine: “do teachers’ conceptions of NOS influence their classroom behaviors and the classroom environment? Do teacher conceptions of NOS directly influence the perspective of their students regarding the NOS? What influences do other contextual factors have upon students’ perspectives of NOS?” (p.14). After interviews with the students, Larson found that 75 to 81 % of the students had identical opinions with their teachers about the nature of scientific knowledge. She reported that teachers’ perspectives concerning the NOS influence both their classroom practices and the classroom environment. She reported direct and positive influences of teacher conceptions upon the students’ conceptions of NOS.

Brickhouse (1990) examined the possible link between teachers’ views of the growth of scientific knowledge and the methods they use to help students construct knowledge of science.  As a result of her study, classroom practices of two out of three teachers were associated with their personal views and philosophies; whereas a third teacher’s classroom practices were not affected at all with their beliefs. She explained that teachers’ views about science have an effect on both explicit lessons about NOS and on the stated curriculum concerning NOS. In other words, the teachers’ understandings of what science is and how students learn science are formed from use of specific instructional strategies. 

Gallagher (1991) qualitatively analyzed experienced secondary teachers’ classroom practices. The results indicate that the teachers’ conceptions about the NOS affect their classroom practices. Similarly, Buss et al. (2002) found that the instructional practices of experienced teachers expressed views of the NOS that are related to their personal conceptions.

Recently many teacher education programs have focused on helping pre-service teachers to understand NOS. This assumption is that teacher conceptions about the NOS directly translate into their teaching practices (Ochanji, 2003).

Palmquist and Finley (1997) found that the pre-service teachers’ views of science mostly matched their teaching methods. The views concerning theory, scientists, and science that were observed in their teaching were fairly contemporary. This supports what Brickhouse (1990) found in her case study that teachers’ views of NOS affect what they do in the classroom.

If academic or research interests in teaching for conceptual change are going to have an impact on science teaching, it is clear that the ideas must first be accepted and adopted by those people already established in the profession, such as science teachers, science supervisors, science educators, and administrators (Jones & Beeth, 1995).

 


Copyright (C) 2006 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 7, Issue 2, Article 10 (Dec., 2006). All Rights Reserved.