Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 5, Issue 3, Article 1 (Dec., 2004)
Mehmet KÜÇÜK & Salih ÇEPNİ
Measurement and assessment for science education in the Turkish educational context: Problems and reflections
Previous Contents

References

American Association For the advancement of Science (1989). Science for all Americans: A project 2061. Reports on Literacy Goals in Science, Mathematics and Technology, Washington, DC.

American Association For the advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, Oxford University Press.

Amrein, A. L. & Berliner, D. C. (2002, March 28). High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(18). Retrieved [Sept. 24, 2004] from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n18/

Baird, B. (1995). The high school science classrooms of the future. The High School Journal (Special issue on the future secondary education. [Available from http:// horizon.unc.edu/projects/HSJ/Baird.asp).

Baker, D. R. & Piburn, M. D. (1997). Constructing science in middle and secondary school classrooms. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Baykul, Y. (1999). İlkögretimde etkili ögretme ve ögrenme ögretmen el kitabi, ilkögretimde ölçme ve degerlendirme (Modul 3), [Available from http://www.meb.gov.tr].

Black, H. (1986). Assessment for learning, in assessing educational achievement. London: The Folmer Press, p.7-18 (Edited By Desmod L. Nuttall).

Brualdi, A. C. (1998). Classroom questions. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 6 (6), Eric Document reproduction no: ED 422407.

Carin, A. A. & Sund, R. B. (1980). Teaching science through discovery. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co.

Çelik, D. (2000). Okullarda ölçme ve degerlendirme nasil olmalidir?. Milli Egitim Press, Istanbul, Turkey.

Çepni, S. & Azar, A. (1998). The analysis of the physics questions asked at high schools exams. III. National Science Education Symposium, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.

Çepni, S. (1993). New science teachers' development in turkey: Implementation for the academy of new teachers' program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton, England.

Çepni, S. (2003). Analysis of university science instructors' examination questions according to the cognitive levels. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 3(1), Mayis / May 2003, 78-84.

Çepni, S., Ayas, A. & Akdeniz, A. R. (1994). Fen bilimlerinde laboratuarin yeri ve önemi (III): Ülkemizde laboratuar kullanimi ve bazi öneriler. Çagdas Egitim Dergisi, 206, 24-28.

Çepni, S., Ayvaci, H. S. & Keles, E. (2001, Eylül). Okullarda ve lise giris sinavlarinda sorulan fen bilgisi sorularinin Bloom Taksonomisine göre karsilastirilmasi. Science Education Symposium in Turkey At The Beginning Of New Thousand Year, University of Maltepe, Istanbul, Turkey.

Çepni, S., Bacanak, A., Özsevgeç, T. & Gökdere, M. (2001, Eylül). LGS sorularinin ve fen bilgisi ögretmenlerinin sorduklari sorularin formal operasyon dönem özellikleriyle iliskilendirilmesi. Science Education Symposium in Turkey At The Beginning Of New Thousand Year, University of Maltepe, Istanbul, Turkey.

Champagne, A. & Newell, S. (1992). Directions for research and development: Alternative methods for assessing scientific literacy. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 29, 841-860.

Cohen, L. & Manion, L. (1995). Research methods in education, (Third Edit.), Routledge.

Collette, A. T. & Chiappetta, E. L. (1989). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools. (Second Edit.), London: Merrill Publishing Company.

Doran, R. L., Tamir, P. & Chan, A. (1995). Assessment in science. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association. pp. 17-18.

ESRD (2004). Student evaluation, A teacher handbook. Evaluation and Student Records Division of Saskatchewan Education. [Available from http://www.sasked.gov.sk.ca/docs/policy/studeval/introbac.html]

Farrell, T. S. C. (1999). Reflective teaching: A case study of a Korean English teacher. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching 9, 105-114.

Fogarty, R. (1997). Problem-based learning and other curriculum models for the multiple intelligence classrooms. Illinois: IRI/skylight Training and Publishing.

Frontczak, K., P., Kowalski, K. & Brown, R. D. (2002). Preschool teachers' use of assessments and curricula: A statewide examination, Exceptional Children, 69(1), 109-123.

Howe, A. C. & Jones, L. (1998). Engaging children in science. Merrill, Prentice Hall, Inc., (Second Edition), Columbus, Ohio.

Karamustafaoglu, S., Sevim, S., Karamustafaoglu, O. & Çepni, S. (2003). Analysis of Turkish high-school chemistry-examination questions according to Bloom’s Taxonomy. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 4 (1), 25-30.

Kaya, A., Çepni, S. & Küçük, M. (2004). Fizik ögretmenlerinin laboratuarlara yönelik hizmet içi ihtiyaçlari için bir program gelistirme çalismasi. Gazi Üniversitesi Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi, 12(1), 41-56.

Kemhacioglu, T. (2001). ÖSS sorularinin lise fizik-1 müfredati ile iliskisi, Unpublished master dissertation, Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey.

Klenowski, V. (1996, September). Connecting assessment and learning. British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Lancaster University.

Küçük, M. (2002). Implementation of an in-service action research course program for science teachers: A case study. Unpublished master dissertation, Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey.

Linn, R. L. & Gronlund, N. E. (1995). Measurement and assessment in teaching. (7th edition) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Mcniff, J. (1995). Teaching as learning an action research approach. Routledge, London and New York.

MEB (2000). Student-centered science teaching program of primary school, Ankara, Turkey.

Morgil, F. İ. & Bayan, S. (1996). Success of secondary school students in solving physics questions of OSS and OYS examinations. Hacettepe Journal of Education, 12, 215-220.

Mueller, S. S., Waters, F. H., Smeaton, P. S. & Pinciotti, P. (2001). Making informed choices: A model for comprehensive classroom assessment. Academic Exchange Quarterly, Spring 5(1) 31

National Forum on Assessment, Principles and Indicators for Student Assessment Systems, The National Center for Fair & Open Testing. [Available from http://www.fairtest.org/princind.htm]

National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Neill, D. M. (1997). Transforming student assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(1), 34-40.

Özden, V. (1997). Ögrenme ve ögretme. Pagem Press, (3. edit), Ankara, Turkey

Pekmez, E. S. (2001). Ögretmenlerin fen egitiminde kullandiklari deneysel çalismalar ile ilgili görüslerinin incelenerek fen egitimi müfredat programlarindaki yerinin belirlenmesi, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Durham, UK.

Sahin, Y. (2001). Türkiye'deki bazi üniversitelerin egitim fakültelerindeki temel fizik laboratuarlarinin kullanimi ve uygulanan yaklasimlarin degerlendirilmesi, Unpublished master dissertation, Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. London: Temple Smith.

Stiggins, R. J. (1991). Facing the challenges of a new era of educational assessment. Applied Measurement in Education 4(4), 263-73.

Turgut, M. F. (1992). Egitimde ölçme ve degerlendirme metotlari. Saydam Press, (9. edit), Ankara, Turkey

Turgut, M. F. (1994, Haziran). Fen ögretiminde ölçme ve degerlendirme. 8. Türk Egitim Dernegi Bilimsel Toplantisi, Ankara,Turkey.

Ulmer, M. B. (2001). Self-grading for formative assessment in problem-based learning. Academic Exchange Quarterly, Spring, 5(1) 68.

Veronesi, P. (2000). Testing and assessment in science education: looking past the scoreboard. The Clearing House, 74 (1), 27-30.

Walker, D. A. (1999). A model for assessing assessment activities. College Student Journal, Sept, 33(3) 439.

Wiggins, G. & McTighe, G. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Yigit, N., Saka, A. Z. & Akdeniz, A. R. (2000). Fizik derslerinde uygulanan ölçme-degerlendirme yaklasimlari, III. National Science Education Symposium, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.

Zeichner, M. & Liston, P. (1996). Reflective teaching: An introduction. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Zoller, U. & Tsaparlis, G. (1997). Higher and lower-order cognitive skills: The case of chemistry. Research in Science Education, 27(1), 117-130.

Zoller, U. (1993). Are lecturing and learning compatible? Maybe for LOCS: Unlikely for HOCS. Journal of Chemical Education, 70 (3), 195-197.

 


Copyright (C) 2004 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 5, Issue 3, Article 1 (Dec., 2004). All Rights Reserved.