Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 20, Issue 1, Article 3 (Aug., 2019)
Himawan PUTRANTA, JUMADI, and Insih WILUJENG
Physics learning by PhET simulation-assisted using problem based learning (PBL) model to improve students' critical thinking skills in work and energy chapters in MAN 3 Sleman

Previous Contents


References

Agusta, E., & Djukri. (2015). The development and implementation of biology teaching kits using self regulated learning (SRL) Strategies. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 3(3), 378–389.

Anita. (2013). Relationship between scenario quality and effectiveness of PBL tutorial group conducted to students of class of 2012 Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Neurology Block. Semarang: UNDIP School of Medicine.

Apino, E., & Retnawati, H. (2017). Developing instructional design to improve mathematical higher order thinking skills of students. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812 (1), 012100).

Astra, I.M., Nasbey, H. & Nugraha, A. (2015). The aim of this research is to create learning medium for senior high school students through an android application in the form of a simulation lab. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(5), 1081-1088.

Astutik, S., & Prahani, B. K. (2018). The practicality and effectiveness of collaborative creativity learning (CCL) model by using PhET simulation to increase students' scientific creativity. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 409-424.

Asyari, M., Al Muhdhar, M. H. I., Susilo, H., & Ibrohim. (2016). Improving critical thinking skills through the integration of problem based learning and group investigation. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 5(1), 36-44.

Azwar, S. (2015). Reliability and validity of edition 4. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Bachtiar, S., Zubaidah, S., Corebima, A. D., & Indriwati, S. E. (2018). The spiritual and social attitudes of students towards integrated problem based learning models. Issues in Educational Research, 28(2), 254.

Bo, W. V., Fulmer, G. W., Lee, C. K. E., & Chen, V. D. T. (2018). How do secondary science teachers perceive the use of interactive simulations? The affordance in Singapore context. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(6), 550-565.

Borich, Gary D. (1994). Observation skill for effective teaching. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Chai, C. S., Tan, L., Deng, F., & Koh, J. H. L. (2017). Examining pre-service teachers’ design capacities for web-based 21st century new culture of learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2).

Correia, A. P., Koehler, N., Thompson, A., & Phye, G. (2019). The application of PhET simulation to teach gas behavior on the submicroscopic level: secondary school students’ perceptions. Research in Science & Technological Education, 37(2), 193-217.

Czabanowska, K., Mous, J. H. C., Meijer, A. W. M., & Back, P. S. (2012). Problem-based learning revisited, introduction of active and self-directed learning to reduce fatigue among students, Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 9(1), 1-13.

Darma, I. K., Candiasa, I. M., Sadia, I. W., & Dantes, N. (2018). The effect of problem based learning model and authentic assessment on mathematical problem solving ability by using numeric ability as the covariable. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1040(1), 012035

Davis, K. S. (2013).” Change is hard”: What science teachers are telling us about reform and teacher learning of innovative practices. Science Education, 87(1), 25-30.

DeFauw, D. L. (2018). One school's yearlong collaboration with a children's book author. The Reading Teacher, 72(3), 355-367.

Dwijananti, P., & Hadi, W. S. (2016). Development of android-based physics comics as a radioactivity subject supplement for high schools. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 4(2).

Eichler, J. F., & Peeples, J. (2016). Flipped classroom modules for large enrollment general chemistry courses: a low barrier approach to increase active learning and improve student grades. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(1), 197-208.

Ekmekci, A., & Gulacar, O. (2015). A case study for comparing the effectiveness of a computer simulation and a hands-on activity on learning electric circuits. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(4).

Ernst, D. C., Hodge, A., & Yoshinobu, S. (2017). What is inquiry-based learning. Notices of the AMS, 64(6), 570-574.

Fatimah, S., & Mufti, Y. (2014). Development of android-based smartphone science-physics learning medium as a strengthening of student science character. Jurnal Kaunia, 10(1), 59-64.

Fuad, N. M., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Suarsini, E. (2017). Improving junior high schools' critical thinking skills based on test three different models of learning. International Journal of Instruction, 10(1), 101-116.

Graham, T., & Berry, J. (1996). A hierarchical model of the development of student understanding of momentum. International Journal of Science Education, 18(1), 75-89.

Hake, R. (2012). Helping students to think like scientists in Socratic dialogue-inducing labs. The Physics Teacher, 50(1), 48-52.

Hasibuan, A. M., Saragih, S., & Amry, Z. (2018). Development of learning materials based on realistic mathematics education to improve problem solving ability and student learning independence. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 243-252.

Hayati, A., Jalilifar, A., & Mashhadi, A. (2013). Using short message service (SMS) to teach English idioms to EFL students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), 66-81.

Hosnan, M. (2014). Scientific and contextual approaches in 21st century learning. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Huang, Y. M., & Chiu, P. S. (2015). The effectiveness of a meaningful learning‐based evaluation model for context‐aware mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 437-447.

Jonassen, D. H., & Hung, W. (2015). All problems are not equal: Implications for problem-based learning. Essential readings in problem-based learning, 2(2), 7-41.

Karatas, I., & Baki, A. (2017). The effect of learning environments based on problem solving on students’ achievements of problem solving. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 5(3), 249-268.

Kong, S. C. (2015). An experience of a three-year study on the development of critical thinking skills in flipped secondary classrooms with pedagogical and technological support. Computers & Education, 89, 16-31.

Kubsch, M., Nordine, J., & Hadinek, D. (2017). Using smartphone thermal cameras to engage students’ misconceptions about energy. The Physics Teacher, 55(8), 504-505.

Kuswandari, Meta. (2013). Development of high school physics teaching materials based on contextual teaching and learning (CTL) on material physics measurement. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Sebelas Maret, 1(2), 1-8.

Lince, R. (2016). Creative thinking ability to increase student mathematical of junior high school by applying models numbered heads together. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(6), 206-212.

Liu, J., & Yao, X. Q. (2016). A study of college-enterprise cooperative major teaching model and spss teaching effect analysis. In 2016 International Conference on Management Science and Management Innovation. Atlantis Press.

Luangrath, P., Pettersson, S., & Benckert, S. (2011). On the use of two versions of the force concept inventory to test conceptual understanding of mechanics in Lao PDR. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 7(2), 103-114.

Manumpil, B., Ismanto, Y., & Onibala, F. (2015). The relationship between the use of gadgets and the level of student achievement in SMA N 9 Manado. ejournal Keperawatan Universitas Sam Ratulangi, 3(2), 1-11.

Megawarni, D.P. (2015). Effect of student perceptions about student-centered learning approaches, (Case study in SMA N 3 Sumbawa Besar). Unpublished thesis. Malang: Postgraduate Program at State University of Malang.

Minister of Education of the Indonesia Republic. (2016). Regulation of the minister of education and culture of the Republic of Indonesia number 21, 2016, concerning content standards.

Moradi, M., Liu, L., Luchies, C., Patterson, M., & Darban, B. (2018). Enhancing teaching-learning effectiveness by creating online interactive instructional modules for fundamental concepts of physics and mathematics. Education Sciences, 8(3), 109.

Nagel, D. (2018). Teaching with technology: In our third-annual ed tech survey, teachers reveal an overwhelmingly positive attitude toward tech in the classroom and its impact on teaching, learning and professional development. THE Journal (Technological Horizons in Education), 45(3), 8.

Namgyel, T., & Buaraphan, K. (2017). The development of simulation and game in 5E learning cycle to teach photoelectric effect for grade 12 students. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching, 18(2), 1-9.

Nurahman, A., Widodo, W., Ishafit, I., & Saulon, B. O. (2019). The development of worksheet based on guided discovery learning method helped by phet simulations interactive media in newton's laws of motion to improve learning outcomes and interest of vocational education 10th grade students. Indonesian Review of Physics, 1(2), 37-41.

Purbasari, R., Kahfi, M., & Yunus, M. (2013). Android application development as a mathematics learning media on dimension material for high school students. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 3-11.

Radnai, T., Juhász, T. T., Juhász, A., & Jenei, P. (2019). Educational experiments with motion simulation programs: can gamification be effective in teaching mechanics? In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1223(1), 012006.

Roll, I., Butler, D., Yee, N., Welsh, A., Perez, S., Briseno, A., & Bonn, D. (2018). Understanding the impact of guiding inquiry: The relationship between directive support, student attributes, and transfer of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours in inquiry learning. Instructional Science, 46(1), 77-104.

Rudyanto, Hendra. (2014). Discovery learning model with scientific approach with character to improve creative thinking ability. Pendidikan dasar dan Pembelajaran. 4(1), 42-45.

Sari, R., Maasawet, E. T., & Masruhim, M. A. (2019). Development of existential intelligence biological learning devices on creative thinking skills of class XI students of Samarinda 6 state school. In Educational Sciences International Conference (ESIC 2018). Atlantis Press.

Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows, 9(2), 5-15.

Shoimin, Aris. (2014). Innovative learning model in the 2013 curriculum. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruz Medium.

Singh, C., & Rosengrant, D. (2003). Multiple-choice test of energy and momentum concepts. American Journal of Physics, 71(6), 607-617.

Siwa, I. B., & Muderawan, I. W. (2013). The effect of project based learning in chemistry learning on science process skills in terms of students' cognitive styles. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran IPA Indonesia, 3(1), 2-10.

Suastra, I. W., Jatmiko, B., Ristiati, N. P., & Yasmini, L. P. B. (2017). Developing characters based on local wisdom of Bali in teaching physics in senior high school. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 306-312.

Sugiarto, A., & Djukri, D. (2015). SETS-based learning as an effort to increase creativity in solving environmental pollution problems. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 1(1), 1-11.

Sugiyono. (2015). Educational research methods. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suwandi, Tawil, M., & Amien, B.D. (2016). Efforts to improve learning outcomes of physics with the problem solving learning approach in class XI science 1 students of SMA N 1 Parangloe. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 1(2), 4-13.

Tan, O. S. (2014). Cognition, metacognition, and problem based learning, inenhancing thinking through problem based learning approaches. Singapore: Cengag Learning.

Tanujaya, B., Mumu, J., & Margono, G. (2017). The relationship between higher order thinking skills and academic performance of student in mathematics instruction. International Education Studies, 10(11), 78-85.

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exiceptional children: a sourcebook. Indiana: Indiana University.

Umarella, S., Rahmawati, A., & Susilowati, N. E. (2019). Interactive multimedia lectora inspire based on problem based learning: Development in the optical equipment. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1), 012011.

Wardani, S., Lindawati, L., & Kusuma, S. B. W. (2017). The development of inquiry by using android-system-based chemistry board game to improve learning outcome and critical thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 196-205.

Widyastuti, F., Helsy, I., Farida, I., & Irwansyah, F. S. (2019). Implementation of PDEODE (predict, discuss, explain, observe, discuss, explain) supported by PhET simulation on solubility equilibrium material. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1), 012071.

Wijnia, L., Loyens, S. M., & Rikers, R. M. (2019). The problem‐based learning process: An overview of different models. the wiley handbook of problem‐based learning, 3(1), 273-295.

Yuliani, K., & Saragih, S. (2015). The development of learning devices based guided discovery model to improve understanding concept and critical thinking mathematically ability of students at islamic junior high school of Medan. Journal of education and practice, 6(24), 116-128.

Yusuf, I., & Widyaningsih, S. W. (2019). HOTS profile of physics education students in STEM-based classes using PhET media. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3), 032021.

Zhang, T., Chen, A., & Ennis, C. (2019). Elementary school students’ naïve conceptions and misconceptions about energy in physical education context. Sport, Education and Society, 24(1), 25-37.

 


Copyright (C) 2019 EdUHK APFSLT. Volume 20, Issue 1, Article 3 (Aug., 2019). All Rights Reserved.