Development and implementation of the science-technology-society learning unit to enhance grade 10 student’s scientific argumentation

Abell, S. K., Anderson, G., & Chezem, J. (2000). Science as argument and explanation: Exploring concepts of sound in third grade. In J. Minstrell & E. H. V. Zee (Eds.), Inquiry into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 100-119). n.p.

Aikenhead, G. S., & Ryan, A. G. (1992). The development of a new instrument: View on science technology- society (VOSTS). Science education, 76(5), 447-491.

Aufschnaiter, C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Shirley, S. (2008). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 101-131.

Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science education, 93(1), 26-55.

Boulter, C. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (1995). Argument and science education. In P. J. M. Costello & S. Mitchell (Eds.), Competing and consensual voices: The theory and practice of argumentation (pp. 84-98). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Chin, C. & Osborne, J. (2010). Supporting argumentation through students’ questions: Case studies in science classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 230-284.

Dawson, V. M., & Venville, G. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing students’ argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school genetics. Research in Science Education, 40(2), 133-148.

Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classroom. Science education, 84(3), 287-312.

Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAP ping into argumentation: Developments in the use of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Science education, 88(6), 915-933.

Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science education, 7, 319–337.

Lin, S. S., & Mintzes, J. J. (2010). Learning argumentation skills through instruction in socio scientific issues: The effect of ability level. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(6), 993-1017.

Ministry of Education. (2001). Basic Education Curriculum B.E. 2544. Bangkok: The Printing House of Express Transportation Organization of Thailand.

Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576.

Office of the Education Council. (2011). Strategic development of human capital of the country in the Education Reform in the Second Decade B.E. 2552-2561 (2009-2018). Bangkok: Office of the education Council.

Office of the National Education Commission. (1999). National Education Act B.E. 2542. Bangkok: Office of the National Education Commission.

Office of the National Education Commission. (2002). The National Education Act B.E. 2542 (1999) and Amendments (second national education act B.E.2545). Bangkok: Pimdeekarnpim.

Protjanatanti, N. (2001). Teaching and learning by STS approach. Songklanakarin Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(2), 225-233.

Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. (2009). Argument-Driven Inquiry to promote learning and interdisciplinary work in science classrooms. The Science Teacher, 76(8), 42-47.

Sturman, A. (1997). Case study methods. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research methodology and measurement: An international handbook (pp. 61-66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of high-Er psychological processes. Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.

Yuenyong, C. (2006). Teaching and learning about energy: Using STS approach. (Ph.D. Dissertation in Science Education Ph.D. Dissertation in Science Education), Kasetsart University, Bangkok.

Ziman, J. (1978 ). Reliable knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62.