Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 19, Issue 2, Article 1 (Dec., 2018)
Lilia HALIM, Norshariani Abd RAHMAN, Noorzaila WAHAB, and Lilia Ellany MOHTAR
Factors influencing interest in STEM careers: An exploratory factor analysis

Previous Contents Next


Research Findings

Exploratory Factor Analysis for Environmental Factors

For environmental factors, a total of 34 items were identified. These 34 items were subjected to principal component analysis (PCA) using SPSS version 23. Prior to performing PCA, the suitability of data for factor analysis was assessed. Inspection of the correlation matrix revealed the presence of many coefficients of .3 and above. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value was .915, exceeding the recommended value of .6 (Pallant, 2011) and the Bartlett's test of sphericity reached a statistical significance, supporting the factorability of the correlation matrix as shown in Table 3.

Table 3. The Findings from Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin and Bartlett's Test for Environmental Factors

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin's Measure of Sampling Adequacy

.915

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity

Approx. Chi-Square

5729.671

 

Df

561

 

Sig.

.000

Principal component analysis revealed the presence of seven components with eigenvalues exceeding 1. An inspection of the scree plot revealed a clear break after the fourth component as shown in Figure 1. Thus, the decision was made to retain these four components for further investigation.


Figure 1. Scree Plot for Environmental Factors

To aid the interpretation of the four components, varimax rotation was used to generate orthogonal factors. The four components' solution explained a total of 49.70% of the variance, with component 1 contributing 19.57%, component 2 contributing 12.08%, component 3 contributing 10.31 %, and component 4 contributing 7.72%, as shown in Table 4.

Table 4. Total Variance Explained for Environmental Factors

 

Initial Eigenvalues

Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings

Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings

Total

% of Variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of Variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of Variance

Cumulative %

1

10.604

31.188

31.188

10.604

31.188

31.188

6.656

19.576

19.576

2

2.819

8.291

39.479

2.819

8.291

39.479

4.109

12.085

31.661

3

1.917

5.639

45.117

1.917

5.639

45.117

3.508

10.318

41.979

4

1.558

4.583

49.700

1.558

4.583

49.700

2.625

7.721

49.700

Table 5. Rotated Component Matrix for Environmental Factors

 

Component

Media influences

Activities outside the classroom

Social influences

Activities in the classroom

d7

.825

 

 

 

d4

.819

 

 

 

d1

.801

 

 

 

d3

.795

 

 

 

d6

.782

 

 

 

d5

.780

 

 

 

d8

.732

 

 

 

d2

.713

 

 

 

d10

.622

 

 

 

d9

.566

 

 

 

b12

 

.728

 

 

b13

 

.710

 

 

b8

 

.681

 

 

b10

 

.656

 

 

b9

 

.626

 

 

b11

 

.595

 

 

b7

 

.489

 

 

b1

 

.459

 

 

c3

 

 

.592

 

c5

 

 

.552

 

c6

 

 

.546

 

c11

 

 

.512

 

c9

 

 

.510

 

c8

 

 

.507

 

c1

 

 

.506

 

c2

 

 

.495

 

c7

 

 

.491

 

c10

 

 

.472

 

c4

 

 

.430

 

b3

 

 

 

.775

b2

 

 

 

.720

b4

 

 

 

.645

b5

 

 

 

.601

b6

 

 

 

 

     

Based on factor loading values as shown in Table 5, item b6 was removed because of low factor loading whereas item b1 was categorized into another group. We decided to retain item b1 in the outside of classroom activity component. We believe that students are highly likely to conduct design activities outside the classroom and not in the classroom as shown in earlier studies. Overall, based on exploratory factor analysis, environmental factors consist of four sub factors i.e., activities in the classroom (component 4), activities outside the classroom (component 2), social influences (component 3), and media influences (component 1).

Exploratory Factor Analysis for STEM Self-Efficacy

20 items were developed for self-efficacy. These 20 items were subjected to principal component analysis (PCA) using SPSS version 23. Inspection of the correlation matrix revealed the presence of many coefficients of .3 and above and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value was .881, exceeding the recommended value of .6 (Pallant, 2011) and the Bartlett's test of sphericity reached a statistical significance, supporting the factorability of the correlation matrix as shown in Table 6.

Table 6. Findings from Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin and Bartlett's Test for Self-Efficacy

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy

.881

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity

Approx. Chi-Square

4192.599

Df

190

Sig.

.000

Principal component analysis revealed the presence of four components with eigenvalues exceeding 1. An inspection of the scree plot revealed a clear break after the fourth component as shown in Figure 2.  

Figure 2. Scree Plot for Self-Efficacy

Varimax rotation was selected because the factors in self-efficacy were determined according to STEM fields. The four components' solution explained a total of 67.86% of the variance, with component 1 contributing 18.05%, component 2 contributing 17.14%, component 3 contributing 16.64%, and component 4 contributing 16.04 %, as shown in Table 7.  

Table 7. Total Variance Explained for Self-Efficacy 

 

Initial Eigenvalues

Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings

Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings

Total

% of Variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of Variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of Variance

Cumulative %

1

7.390

36.952

36.952

7.390

36.952

36.952

3.609

18.046

18.046

2

2.671

13.353

50.305

2.671

13.353

50.305

3.429

17.144

35.190

3

1.910

9.552

59.858

1.910

9.552

59.858

3.329

16.643

51.833

4

1.602

8.010

67.868

1.602

8.010

67.868

3.207

16.035

67.868

Based on the factor loading values in the rotated component matrix as shown in Table 8, all the 20 items belonged to the four elements, namely i) Science (e1 to e5), ii) Technology (e6 to e10), iii) Engineering (e11 to e15), and iv) Mathematics (e16 to e20).

Table 8. Rotated Component Matrix for Self-Efficacy  

 

Component

Science

Mathematics

Engineering

Technology

e4

.851

 

 

 

e2

.811

 

 

 

e3

.807

 

 

 

e1

.721

 

 

 

e5

.693

 

 

 

e20

 

.869

 

 

e16

 

.842

 

 

e17

 

.766

 

 

e19

 

.743

 

 

e18

 

.646

 

 

e13

 

 

.816

 

e14

 

 

.805

 

e15

 

 

.750

 

e12

 

 

.746

 

e11

 

 

.668

 

e8

 

 

 

.818

e9

 

 

 

.812

e6

 

 

 

.792

e10

 

 

 

.748

e7

 

 

 

.722

Exploratory Factor Analysis for Perception of STEM Careers

14 items were developed for perception of STEM careers. These 14 items were subjected to principal component analysis (PCA). Prior to performing PCA, the suitability of data for factor analysis was assessed. Inspection of the correlation matrix revealed the presence of many coefficients of .3 and above. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value was .880, exceeding the recommended value of .6 (Pallant, 2011) and the Bartlett's test of sphericity reached a statistical significance, supporting the factorability of the correlation matrix as shown in Table 9.

Table 9. Findings from Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin and Bartlett's Test for Perception of STEM Careers

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy

.880

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity

Approx. Chi-Square

2533.864

Df

 91

Sig.

.000

Initially, principal component analysis revealed the presence of three components with eigenvalues exceeding 1. An inspection of the scree plot revealed a clear break after the thirdcomponent as shown in Figure 2. 

Figure 3. Scree Plot for Perception of STEM Careers

However, we decided to keep to two components as determined earlier using varimax rotation. The two solutions explained a total of 56.86% of the variance, with component 1 contributing 30.03% and component 2 contributing 26.83 %, as shown in Table 10.

Table 10. Total Variance Explained for Perception of STEM Careers

 

Initial Eigenvalues

Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings

Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings

Total

% of Variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of Variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of Variance

Cumulative %

1

5.811

41.506

41.506

5.811

41.506

41.506

4.204

30.029

30.029

2

2.149

15.350

56.856

2.149

15.350

56.856

3.756

26.827

56.856

Based on the factor loading values in the rotated component matrix as shown in Table 8, all the 14 items belonged to the two components as was decided earlier in this study. Table 11 shows the rotated component matrix for perception of STEM careers belong into two sub factors i.e., job prospect in STEM careers and skills needed in STEM careers.  

Table 11. Rotated Component Matrix for Perception of STEM Careers

 

Component

Job Prospect

Skills Needed

f2

.774

 

f6

.766

 

f3

.749

 

f4

.740

 

f1

.736

 

f5

.620

 

f8

.612

 

f7

.453

 

f10

 

.858

f11

 

.856

f12

 

.844

f13

 

.763

f14

 

.638

f9

 

.515

Exploratory Factor Analysis for Interest in STEM Careers

12 items were developed for interest in STEM careers. These 12 items were subjected to principal component analysis (PCA). Prior to performing PCA, the suitability of data for factor analysis was assessed. Inspection of the correlation matrix revealed the presence of many coefficients of .3 and above. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value was .875, exceeding the recommended value of .6 (Pallant, 2011) and the Bartlett's test of sphericity reached a statistical significance, supporting the factorability of the correlation matrix as shown in Table 12.

Table 12. Findings from Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin and Bartlett's Test for Interest in STEM Careers

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy

.875

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity

Approx. Chi-Square

1439.306

Df

 66

Sig.

.000

Initially, principal component analysis revealed the presence of two components with eigenvalues exceeding 1. An inspection of the scree plot revealed a clear break after the two components as shown in Figure 2.  

Figure 4. Scree Plot for Interest in STEM Careers

To aid interpretation of the two components, varimax rotation was performed. The two solutions explained a total of 51.450% of the variance, with component 1 contributing 25.749% and component 2 contributing 25.701%, as shown in Table 13.  

Table 13. Total Variance Explained for Interest in STEM Careers

 

Initial Eigenvalues

Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings

Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings

Total

% of Variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of Variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of Variance

Cumulative %

1

4.842

40.348

40.348

4.842

40.348

40.348

3.090

25.749

25.749

2

1.332

11.102

51.450

1.332

11.102

51.450

3.084

25.701

51.450

Based on the factor loading values in the rotated component matrix as shown in Table 14, all the 12 items belonged to the two components i.e., physical sciences and life sciences. Physical sciences are items/work related to physics, mathematics, computer sciences, energy, engineering and entrepreneur or business scientist careers. In contrast, careers in life sciences consist of jobs related to environmental works, biology and zoology, earth science, medical science, chemistry and science teachers or educators.  

Table 14. Rotated Component Matrix for Interest in STEM Careers

 

Component

Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

g7

.821

 

g3

.777

 

g8

.656

 

g5

.609

 

g2

.536

 

g12

.494

 

g10

 

.832

g9

 

.805

g6

 

.634

g1

 

.571

g11

 

.547

g4

 

.424

Reliability Analysis

Overall, the Cronbach's alpha value for each factor was between .817 and .933. Thus, each value indicated that all items showed high reliability as shown is Table 15.

Table 15. Cronbach's Alpha Value

No.

Construct

Element

Cronbach's Alpha  Value

1

 

Learning experiences

 

In the classroom

.704

Outside the classroom

.833

2

Social influences

-

.817

3

Media influences

-

.933

4

 

 

 

Self-efficacy

 

 

 

Science

.892

Technology

.849

Engineering

.856

Mathematics

.897

5

 

Perception of STEM careers

 

Job prospect

.858

Skills needed in STEM career

.873

6

Interest in STEM careers

 

.863

Interpretation of Total Score Mean

The level for each factor was interpreted through the total score mean value and categorized as shown in Table 16. The total score mean interpretation was adapted from Nunnally (1997) where scores are indicated as low, medium low, medium high and high based on the total score mean obtained.

Table 16. Mean Value and Interpretation of Total Score Mean

Total Score Mean

Interpretation of  Total Score Mean

1.00 - 2.50

2.51 - 5.00

5.01 - 7.50

7.51 - 10.00

Low

Medium Low

Medium High

High

  (Adapted from Nunnally, 1997) 

 


Copyright (C) 2018 EdUHK APFSLT. Volume 19, Issue 2, Article 1 (Dec., 2018). All Rights Reserved.