Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 19, Issue 1, Article 10 (Jun., 2018)
Maria Tensiana TIMA and Hari SUTRISNO
Effect of using problem-solving model based on multiple representations on the students' cognitive achievement: Representations of chemical equilibrium

Previous Contents


References

Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers & Education, 33,131-152.

Akaygun, S. (2016). Is the oxygen atom static or dynamic? The effect of generating animations on students’ mental models of atomic structure. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17, 788-807.

Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Netherlands: Springer

Chakravarti, I. M., Laha, R. G., & Roy, J. (1967). Handbook of methods of applied statistics, Vol. I, John Wiley and Sons, pp. 392-394.

Chandrasegaran, A. L.,  Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2007). The development of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school students’ ability to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of representation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8 (3), 293-307

Cracolice, M. S., Deming, J. C., & Ehlert, B. (2008). Concept learning versus problem-solving: A cognitive difference. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(6), 873–878.

Gulacar, O., Bowman, C. R., & Feakes, D. A. (2013). Observational investigation of student problem solving:  The role and importance of habits. Science Education International, 24(2), 344-360.

Guzel, B.Y. & Adadan, E., (2013). Use of Multiple Representations in Developing Preservice Chemistry Teachers’ Understanding of the Structure of Matter. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 8(1), 109-130

Jhonstone, A. H. (1993). The development of chemistry teaching: a changing response to changing demand. Symposium on fievolution and Evolution in Chemical Education. 70(9), 701-705.

Kosma, R., & Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: expert and novice responses to different reponses of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 949-968.

Krajcik, J. S. (1991). Developing students' understanding of chemical concepts. The Psychology of Learning Science: International perspectives on the psychological foundations of technology-related learning environments. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum: 117-145

Levene, H. (1960). Robust Tests for Equality of Variances (edited by Olkin, I.,  Ghurye, S. G., Hoeffding, W.,  Madow, W. G., &  Mann, H. B.).  In Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling, pp. 278-292.

Mocerino, M. (2009). Emphasizing Multiple Levels of representation to enhance student’s understandings of the changes occurring during chemical reactions. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(12), 1433-1436

Nakiboglu, C. (2003), Instructional Misconceptions of Turkish prospective chemistry teachers about atomic orbitals and hybridization, Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 4(2), 171- 188.

Pedrosa, M. A., & Dias, M. H. (2000). Chemistry textbook approaches to chemical equilibrium and student alternative conceptions.  Chemistry Education: Research And Practice in Europe, 1(2), 227-236.

Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it. A new aspect of mathematical method. New Jersey : Princeton University Press.

Posamentier, A. S., & Krulik, S. (2009). Problem-solving mathematics in grades 3–6. United States of America: Corwin

Robertson, S. I. (2001). Problem-solving. UK: Psychology Press

Sendur, G., Toprak, M., & Pekmez, E.S. (2010), Analyzing of students’ misconceptions about chemical equilibrium, International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications November 2010, 1-7

Smith, K.C., & Nakhleh, M. B. (2011). University students’ conceptions of bonding in melting and dissolving phenomena. Chemistry Education Research Practice, 12, 398-408.

Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. (1989), Statistical methods, 8th Edition, Iowa State University Press.

Sunyono, Yuanita, L., & Ibrahim, M. (2015). Supporting students in learning with multiple representations to improve student mental models on atomic structure concepts. Science Education International, 26(2), 104-125

Wang, C.Y. & Barrow, L.H. (2013). Exploring conceptual frameworks of models of atomic structures and periodic variations, chemical bonding, and molecular shape and polarity: a comparison of undergraduate general chemistry students with high and low levels of content knowledge. Chemistry Education Research Practice, 14, 130–146.

 


Copyright (C) 2018 EdUHK APFSLT. Volume 19, Issue 1, Article 10 (Jun., 2018). All Rights Reserved.