Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 19, Issue 1, Article 9 (Jun., 2018)
Sunyono SUNYONO and Sudjarwo SUDJARWO
Mental models of atomic structure concepts of 11th grade chemistry students

Previous Contents


Buckley, B. C., & Boulter, C. J. (2000). Investigating the Role of Representations and Expressed Models in Building Mental Models. The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands. Retrieved from

Cañas, J.J., Antoli, A., & Quesada, J.F., 2001. “The Role of Working Memory in Measuring Mental Models of Physical Systems.” Psicolõgica, No. 22. Retrieved from

Chittleborough, G., & Treagust, D. F. (2007). The Modelling Ability Of Non-Major Chemistry Students And Their Understanding Of The Sub-Microscopic Level. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(3), 274–292. doi: 10.1039/B6RP90035F.

Chudzicka-Czupała, A., Lupina-Wegener, A., Borter, S., & Hapon, N. (2013). Students' attitude toward cheating in Switzerland, Ukraine, and Poland. The New Educational Review, 32 (2), 66-76.

Coll, R. K. (2008). Chemistry Learners’ Preferred Mental Models for Chemical Bonding. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 5(1), 22–47. doi: 10.12973/tused.10178

Coll, R. K. & Treagust, D. F. (2003), Investigation of secondary school, undergraduate, and graduate learners' mental models of ionic bonding. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 40(5), 464–486. doi:10.1002/tea.10085.

Devetak, I., Erna, D.L., Mojca, J., and Glažar, S.A. (2009). “Comparing Slovenian Year 8 and Year 9 Elementary School Pupils’ Knowledge of Electrolyte Chemistry and Their Intrinsic Motivation. Chem.Educ. Res. Pract., 10, p. 281–290. Doi: 10.1039/b290833j.

Franco, C., Lins de Barros, H., Colinvaux, D., Krapas, S., Queiroz, G., & Alves, F. (1999). From scientists' and inventors' minds to some scientific and technological products: relationships between theories, models, mental models, and conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 21(3), 277–291. doi: 10.1080/095006999290705.

Gilbert, J. K. (1997). Exploring models and modelling in science education and technology education. Reading, England: The University of Reading

Greca, I. M., & Moreira, M. A. (2000). International Journal of Mental models, conceptual models, and modeling. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1080/095006900289976.

Hilton, A., & Nichols, K. (2011). Representational classroom practices that contribute to students’ conceptual and representational understanding of chemical bonding. International Journal of Science Education, 33(16), 2215–2246. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.543438

Hsu, L. (2014). Modeling determinants for the integration of Web 2.0 technologies into hospitality education: A Taiwanese case. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(4), 625–633. doi: 10.1007/s40299-014-0208-z.

Hu, W., Wu, B., Jia, X., Yi, X., Duan, C., Meyer, W., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Increasing students’ scientific creativity: The “Learn to Think” Intervention Program. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(1), 3–21. doi: 10.1002/jocb.20.

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1980). Mental models in cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 4(1), 71–115. Doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0401_4.

Johnstone, A. H. (1993). The development of chemistry teaching: A changing response to changing demand. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(9), 701–705. doi: 10.1021/ed070p701.

Park, E. J. (2006). Student perception and conceptual development as represented by student mental models of atomic structure. The Ohio State University. Retrieved from

Park, E. J., & Light, G. (2009). Identifying atomic structure as a threshold concept: student mental models and troublesomeness. International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), doi: 10.1080/09500690701675880.

Rickheit, G., & Sichelschmidt, L. (1999). Mental models: Some answers, some questions, some suggestions. In Mental Models in Discourse Processing and Reasoning (Vol. 128, pp. 9–40). The Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved from science/article/pii/S0166411599800454.

Suits, J. P., & Hypolite, K. L. (2004). Use of Spectroscopic Representations in Student-Generated Atomic Models. Spectroscopy Letters, 37(3), 245–262. doi: 10.1081/SL-120038761.

Sunyono, S., Yuanita, L., & Ibrahim, M. (2015). Supporting Students in Learning with Multiple Representation to Improve Student Mental Models on Atomic Structure Concepts. Science Education International, 26(2), 104–125.

Sunyono, S., & Yulianti, D. (2015). An introductory study of students' mental models in understanding the concept of atomic structure (case study on high school students in Lampung Indonesia ). The Online Journal of New Horizon In Education, 5(4), 41–50.

Treagust, D., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. (2003). The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1353–1368. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000070306.

Tümay, H. (2014). Prospective chemistry teachers' mental models of vapor pressure. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(3), 366-379. doi: 10.1039/c4rp00024b.

Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535–585. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90018-W.

Wang, C.Y. (2007). The Role of Mental-Modeling Ability, Content Knowledge, and Mental Models in General Chemistry Students' Understanding about Molecular Polari, Dissertation for the Doctor Degree of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the University of Missouri. Columbia.

Yakmaci-Guzel, B., & Adadan, E. (2013). “Use of Multiple Representations in Developing Pre-service Chemistry Teachers’ Understanding of The Structure of Matter,” International Journal of Environmental & Science Education. 8, No. 1. p. 109-130


Copyright (C) 2018 EdUHK APFSLT. Volume 19, Issue 1, Article 9 (Jun., 2018). All Rights Reserved.