 |
Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 18, Issue 2, Article 11 (Dec., 2017) |
|
Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 18, Issue 2, Article 11 (Dec., 2017) |
Baddock, M., & Bucat, R. (2008). Effectiveness of a Classroom Chemistry Demonstration using the Cognitive Conflict Strategy. International Journal of Science Education, 30(8), 1115–1128.
Bilici, C. S. (2012). The pre-service science teachers’technological pedagogical content knowledge and their self-efficacy (PhD Thesis). Gazi University/ Institute of Education Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
Buncick, M. C, Betts, P. G., & Horgan, D. D. (2001). Using demonstrations as a contextual road map: enhancing course continuity and promoting active engagement in introductory college physics. International Journal of Science Education, 23(12), 1237-1255.
Callan, J.P., Crouch, C.H., Fagen, A.P., & Mazur, E. (2004). Classroom demonstrations: Learning tools or entertainment? American Journal of Physics, 72(6), 835-838.
Chin, C. (1992). The use of discrepant events in teaching and learning science. Teaching and Learning, 13(1), 51-57.
Clement, J. (1993). “Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students’ preconceptions in physics,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 1241–1257.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
Duit, R. & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning, International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671-688, DOI: 10.1080/09500690305016
Dykstra, D. I., Boyle, C. F. & Monarch, I. A. (1992). Studying conceptual change in learning physics. Science Education, 76, 615–652
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press. California.
Friedl, A.E. (1986). Teaching Science to Children, Random House, New York.
González-Espada, W. J., Birriel, J. & Birriel, I. (2010). Discrepant Events: A Challenge to Students’ Intuition. The Physics Teacher. 48. 507-511.
Karplus, R. & Thier, H. (1967). A new look at elementary school science. Chicago: RandMcNally.
Longfield, J. (2009). Discrepant Teaching Events: Using an Inquiry Stance to Address Students’ Misconceptions. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 21(2). 266-271.
Manaf, E. B. A., & Subramaniam, R. (2004, June). Use of chemistry demonstrations to foster conceptual understanding and cooperative learning among students. Paper presented at the International Association for the Study of Cooperation in Education, Singapore.
Mancuso, V. J. (2010). Using Discrepant Events in Science Demonstrations to Promote Student Engagement in Scientific Investigations: An Action Research Study, PhD thesis, Warner School of Education and Human Development University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
Mason, D., Griffith, W. F., Hogue, S. E., Holley, K. & Hunter, K. (2004). Discrepant event: The great bowling ball float-off. Journal of Chemical Education. 81(9), 1309-1312.
Meyer, L. S., Schmidt, S., Nozawa, F., & Paneee, D. (2003). Using demonstrations to promote student comprehension in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(4), 431-435.
Miles, M. B, & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London:Sage Publication.
Misiti, F. L., Jr. (2000, September). The pressure’s on. Science Scope, p. 34-38.
Ministry of Education (2013). Primary Science and Technology Course (6th, 7th and 8th Grades) Curriculum. Ankara.
O’Brien, T. (2010). Brain-Powered Science: Teaching and Learning With Discrepant Events. National Science Teachers Association. 1-41.
Park, J. (2006). Modeling analysis of students’ processes of generating scientific explanatory hypotheses. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 469–489.
Pintrich, P.R., Marx, R.W., & Boyle, R.A. (1994). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63 (2), 167-199.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods . SAGE Publications, inc.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Turkmen, H. (2006). How should science be taught by using learning cycle approach in elementary schools? Elementary Education Online, 5(2), 1-15.
Weller, H. (2008). What is a “discrepant event” in teaching? http://misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/boss/classes/SMS_491_2008/week2/discrepant_event.pdf [03.04.2015]
Willis, C. (1999). A Collection of Discrepant Events. National Science Teachers Association-NSTA.
Wright, E.L. & Govindarajan, G. (1992). Stirring the biology teaching pot with discrepant events. The American Biology Teacher, 54(4), 205-210
Wright, E.L. & Govindarajan, G. (1995). Discrepant event demonstrations: Motivating students to learn science concepts. The Science Teacher, 62(1), 25- 28.
Copyright (C) 2017 EdUHK APFSLT. Volume 18, Issue 2, Article 11 (Dec., 2017). All Rights Reserved.
