Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 18, Issue 1, Article 4 (Jun., 2017)
Ali Rıza SEKERCI, Nail ILHAN, Mustafa SOZBILIR and Ali YILDIRIM
Science and technology teachers’ attitudes towards educational research in Turkey

Previous Contents 


References

Biesta, G. (2007). Bridging the gap between educational research and educational practice: The need for critical distance. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(3), 295-301.

Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis: For applied research. New York: Guilford.

Buyukozturk, S. Cokluk-Bokeoglu, O., & Koklu, N. (2012). Sosyal bilimler icin istatistik [Statistics for social sciences] (11. Baskı). Ankara: PegemA Akademi.

Cousins, J. B., & Walker, C. (2000). Predictors of educators‟ valuing of systematic inquiry in schools. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 15, 25-52.

De Jong, O. (2004). Mind your step: Bridging the research-practice gap. Australian Journal of Education in Chemistry, 64, 5-9.

Ekiz, D. (2006). Sınıf ogretmenlerinin egitim arastırmalarına karsı tutumları [Primary school teachers’ attitudes towards educational research]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 373-402.

Everton, T., Galton, M., & Pell, T. (2002). Educational research and the teacher. Research Papers in Education, 17(4), 373-401.

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th edition). London: SAGE Publications.

Gore, J. M., & Gitlin, A. D. (2004). [Re]Visioning the academic–teacher divide: power and knowledge in the educational community. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 10(1), 35-58.

Greenwood, C. R., & Maheadly, L. (2001). Are future teachers aware of the gap between research and practice and what should they know? Teacher Education and Special Education, 24(4), 333-347.

Hemsley-Brown, J., & Sharp, C. (2003). The use of research to improve Professional practice: A systematic review of the literature. Oxford Review of Education, 29(4), 449-471.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.

Ilhan, N., Sekerci, A. R., Sozbilir, M. & Yıldırım, A. (2013).  Egıtım arastırmalarına yonelik ogretmen tutum olceginin gelistirilmesi: Gecerlik ve guvenirlık calısması [The development of teachers attitude scale towards educational research: the validity and reliability study]. Western Anatolia Journal of Educations Sciences, 4(8), 31-56.

Isakson, R. L., & Ellsworth, R. (1978). Teachers’ attitudes toward educational research: It’s time for a change. The Teacher Educator, 14(2), 9-13. doi:10.1080/08878737809554696.

Kaestle, C. (1993). The awful reputation of educational research. Educational Researcher, 22(1), 23 - 31.

Kempa, R. (2002). Research and research utilization in chemical education. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 3(3), 327-343.

Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd. ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

Korkmaz, O., Sahin, A., & Yesil, R. (2011a). Ogretmen Adaylarının Bilimsel Arastırmalara Yonelik Tutumları. [Candidate Teachers’ Attitude toward Scientific Research] International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(3), 1169-1194.

Korkmaz, O., Sahin, A., & Yesil, R. (2011b). Ogretmenlerin Bilimsel Arastırmalara ve Arastırmacılara iliskin dusunceleri [Teachers’ Opinion Regarding Scientific Researches and Researchers]. Kuramsal Egitim bilim Dergisi, 4(2), 109-127.

McIntyre, D. (2005). Bridging the gap between research and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(3), 357-382.

McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Papanastasiou, E. C. (2005). Factor structure of the “Attitudes Toward Research” scale. Statistics Education Research Journal, 4(1), 16-26.

Sumer, N. (2000). Yapısal esitlik modellerı: Temel kavramlar ve ornek uygulamalar [Structural equation modeling: basic concepts and sample applications]. Turk Psıkolojı Yazıları, 3(6), 49-74.

Vanderlinde, R., & van Braak, J. (2010). The gap between educational research and practice: views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 299 – 316.

Yavuz, M. (2009). Egıtım arastırmaları ile ilgili ogretmen ve yonetici goruslerinin analizi[An analysis of thought of teachers and principals on educational research]. Selcuk Universitesi Ahmet Kelesoglu Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 27, 143-158.

Yıldırım, A., Ilhan, N., Sekerci, A. R. & Sozbilir, M. (2014). Fen ve teknolojı ogretmenlerinin egitim arastırmalarını takip etme, anlama ve uygulamalarda kullanma duzeyleri: Erzurum ve Erzincan ornegi [Science teachers’ level of following, understanding and using of educational researches: the example of Erzurum and Erzincan]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 22(1), 81-100.

Yıldırım, A., Sozbilir, M., Ilhan, N., & Sekerci, A. R. (2010). Fen ve teknoloji ogretmenlerinin fen egitimi arastırmalarını takip etme, anlama ve sonuclarını uygulamaya yansıtma durumlarının incelenmesı [The determination of science and technology teacher’s levels of awareness and understanding of education research and the state of using research finding in the class practicing]. TUBITAK Project Report, ProjectNo:108K325.http://uvt.ulakbim.gov.tr/uvt/index.php?cwid=9&vtadi=TPRJ&ano=121431_662d887a4290e12e1dd59df7ad6078af (Access date: 11 August 2013).

Zeuli, J. (1994). How do teachers understand research when they read it? Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(1), 39-55.

 

 


Copyright (C) 2017 EdUHK APFSLT. Volume 18, Issue 1, Article 4 (Jun., 2017). All Rights Reserved.