Subject-specific science teachers’ views of alternative assessment

Acad, M.B. and Demir, E. (2007). Views of classroom teachers problems related to the ımplementation of alternative assessment methods in primary education program. Paper presented at the First National Primary Congress, November 15-17, Ankara, Turkey (In Turkish).

Anderson, R. S. (1998). Why talk about different ways to grade? The shift from traditional assessment to alternative assessment. In R. S. Anderson & B. W. Speck (Eds.), Changing The Way We Grade Student Performance: Classroom Assessment and The New Learning Paradigm (pp. 5-16). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Aydın, F.(2005). Alternative Assessment of teachers and their Views on Apply. XIV. National Education Congress, Pamukkale University Faculty of Education, Denizli.

Baki, A. (2008). Application of the Theory of Mathematics Education. Ankara: Harf Educational Publishing.

Bulut, İ. (2006). Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the application of the new primary school program. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Institute of Social Sciences, Firat University, Elazig.

Care,E., Scoular, C. & Griffin, P. (2016). Assessment of Collaborative Problem Solving in Education Environments. Applıed Measurement ın Educatıon, 29(4), 250–264.

Cheng, H.M. (2006). Junior Secondary Science Teachers' Understanding and Practice of Alternative Assessment in Hong Kong: Implications for Teacher Professional Development. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 6,3.

Corconan, A.C., Dershimer L.E & Tickhenor S.M. (2004). A Teacher’s Guide to Alternative Assessment, Taking The First Steps, The Clearing House May- June 2004.

Çakır, İ. & Çimer, O.S. (2007). Qualifications and Application Problems Alternative Assessment Evaluation on the Science and Technology Teacher. First National Congress of Primary Education. Hacettepe University, Ankara.

Çalık, S. (2007). “A research on thoughts about the primary teacher related to measurement and evaluation of the programs renewed", E. Ergin (Edit.) XVI. Education Congress, Volume 2: 323-330, New York: Detay Publishing.

Çalık, M., Ayas, A. (2008). A critical review of the development of the Turkish science curriculum. In R.K. Coll and N. Taylor (Eds), Science Education in Context: An International Examination of the Influence of Context on Science Curricula Development and Implementation (pp. 161–174), Sense Publishers B.V., AW Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Çalik, M. & Cobern, W.M. (2017). A cross-cultural study of CKCM efficacy in an undergraduate chemistry classroom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice DOI: 10.1039/c7rp00016b

Çalık, M., Ültay, N., Kolomuç, A., Aytar, A., (2015). A cross-age study of science student teachers’ chemistry attitudes Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 228-236.

Çalık, M. (2016). Turkey. B. Vlaardingerbroek & N. Taylor (Eds.), Teacher Quality in Upper Secondary Science Education: International Perspectives (pp. 131-146), Palgrave Macmillan, USA.

DeMauro, T., Helphrey, T., Schram, G., & Spiekermann, C. (2001). Comparing students’ attitudes towards the use of traditional and alternative assessment practices (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No: ED 456 125).

Dikli, S. (2003). Assessment at a distance: Traditional vs. alternative assessments. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2 (3), 13–19.

Evans, B.R, (2014).Mathematics and Science Teaching for New Alternative Certification Teachers. JNAAC, Vol.9, Number 2,Fall.

Forgasz, H.J. (1991). Gender, pre-service teachers and assessment of pupil work. Research in Science Education, 21(1), 113-122.

Gömleksiz, M.N. & Kan, A.Ü. (2007). “Views Of Classroom Teacher Candidates on New Primary School Curriculum Assessment and Evaluation Methods of the Recognition Level, "First National Primary Congress, 15-17 November in Ankara.

Hair, J.F., Andersen, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed. Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Kurbanoğlu, N. I. (2014). Investigation of the relationships between high school students’ chemistry laboratory anxiety and chemistry attitudes in terms of gender and types of school. Education and Science-Egitim ve Bilim, 39(171), 199–210.

Miesels, S. J. (1995). Performance assessment in early childhood education: The work sampling system. ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education Urbana IL (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No: ED 382 407).

Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB). (2005). İlköğretim 1–5. sınıf programları tanıtım el kitabı. Ankara.

Naser, T. (2008). Problem çözme becerilerini değerlendirmede alternatif yöntemler ve ilköğretim matematikte örnek uygulama. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Van.

Okur, M. (2008). Determination of view of 4th and 5th Grade Teachers on Alternatively Assessment and Evaluation Used in Science and Technology Classroom. Master Thesis, Karaelmas University, Institute of Social Sciences, Zonguldak.

Osborne J., Simon S. and Collins S., (2003), Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 25(9), 1049–1079.

Struyven, K., Dochy, F., Janssens, S., Schelfhout, W., & Gielen S. (2006). The overall effects of end-of-course assessment on student performance: a comparison between multiple choice testing, peer assessment, case-based assessment and portfolio assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32, 202–222.

Şaşmaz-Ören, F. ve Tatar, N. (2007). İlköğretim sınıf öğretmenlerinin alternatif değerlendirme yaklaşımlarına ilişkin görüş- leri I. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22, 15–27.

Yaman, S. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions about their measurement and evaluation practices in science and technology course. Elementary Education Online, 10(1), 244-256.

Yayla, R.G. (2011). The relationship between self-efficacy for alternative assessment approaches with experience of Science and Technology Teacher. 2nd International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications 27-29 April, 2011 Antalya-Turkey.

Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2006). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.

Zessoules, R., & Gardner, H. (1991). Authentic assessment: Beyond the buzzword and into the classroom. In V. Perrone (Ed.), Expanding student assessment. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.