¨È¤Ó¬ì¾Ç±Ð¨|½×¾Â¡A²Ä¤Q¤K´Á¡A²Ä¤@¥U¡A¤å³¹¤Q¤@(¤G¹s¤@¤C¦~¤»¤ë)
³¯¥¿ªv¡B¼B¹Å¯ø
¦P¾«¹Î°Q¹ï¬ì¾Ç·§©À§ïÅܤ§±´°Q
¤W¤@­¶ ¤º®e

°Ñ¦Ò¤åÄm

 

§õ¥É­s¡]¥Á89¡^¡G¡m¥ú¾Ç¥v¿Ä¤J±Ð¾Ç¹ï°ª¤¤¥Í¬ì¾Ç¥»½èÆ[¤Î¥ú·§©Àªº§ïÅܤ§¬ã¨s¡n¡CºÓ¤h½×¤å¡A°ê¥ß°ª¶¯®v½d¤j¾Ç¬ì¾Ç±Ð¨|¬ã¨s©Ò¡C

¥þ¤¤¥­(1994): ®v½d¾Ç°|¾Ç¥Í¹ï¾Ç²ßª«²z¤O¾Ç·§©À¤§¤ÀªR¬ã¨s¡C°ê¥ß»O¥_®v½d¾Ç°|¾Ç³ø, 7, 481~506¡C

¥ô©v¯E(2001)¡R¤ß´¼¼Ò¦¡°ÊºAÅܤƤ§¬ã¨s-ª«²z²{¶HªºÆ[¹î»P¸àÄÀ¡C¬ì¾Ç±Ð¨|¾Ç¥Z, 9(2), 147-168¡C

§d©ÉùÜ(2007): ¸ó¦~¯Å¾Ç¥Í®ðÅé¤ß´¼¼Ò¦¡ºtÅܾúµ{¤§±´¨s»P¤ÀªR¡C°ê¥ß¥xÆW®v½d¤j¾Ç¬ì¾Ç±Ð¨|¬ã¨s©ÒºÓ¤h½×¤å(¥¼¥Xª©)¡C

§d©ú¯](2008): ¬ì¾Ç¼Ò«¬¥»½è­åªR¡G»{Ãѽ׭±¦Vªì±´¡C¬ì¾Ç±Ð¨|¤ë¥Z, 307, 2-8¡C

©Pª÷«°(2008): ±´¨s¤¤¾Ç¥Í¹ï¬ì¾Ç¼Ò«¬ªº¤ÀÃþ»P²Õ¦¨¥»½èªº²z¸Ñ¡C¬ì¾Ç±Ð¨|¤ë¥Z, 306, 10-17¡C

ªLÀR¶²»Pªô¬ü­i(2008): ±q»{ÃÑ/¤èªk½×¤§¦V«×ªì±´°ª¤¤¾Ç¥Í¼Ò«¬¤Î«Ø¼Ò¾úµ{¤§ª¾ÃÑ¡C¬ì¾Ç±Ð¨|¤ë¥Z, 307, 9-14¡C

ªô¬ü­i(2000): ·§©À§ïÅܬã¨sªº¬Ù«ä»P±Ò¥Ü¡C¬ì¾Ç±Ð¨|¾Ç¥Z, 8(1), 1-34¡C

ªô¬ü­i(2007): «Ø¼Ò¯à¤O¤ÀªR«ü¼ÐªºÀ³¥Î-¥H¹q¤Æ¾Ç¬°¨Ò¡A¦æ¬F°|°ê®a¬ì¾Ç©e­û·|±MÃD¬ã¨s­pµe¦¨ªG³ø§i, NSC 95-2511-S-003-024-MY2¡C

ªô¬ü­i(2008): ¼Ò«¬»P«Ø¼Ò¯à¤O¤§²z½×¬[ºc¡C¬ì¾Ç±Ð¨|¤ë¥Z, 306, 2-9¡C

ªô¬ü­i»PªLÀR¶²(2002): ¥H¦h­«Ãþ¤ñ±´¨s¨àµ£¹q¬y¤ß´¼¼Ò¦¡¤§§ïÅÜ¡C¬ì¾Ç±Ð¨|, 10(2), 109-134¡C

¶À¤å«T¡]¥Á83¡^¡G¡m°ê¤¤¥Íª«²zÀ£¤O°g«ä·§©À¤Î·§©À§ïÅܱоǥi¦æ©Ê¤§¬ã¨s¡n¡CºÓ¤h½×¤å¡A¨p¥ß²H¦¿¤j¾Ç±Ð¨|¸ê®Æ¬ì¾Ç¬ã¨s©Ò¡C

³¢­«¦N¡B·¨¨ä¦w(1989): §Q¥ÎÁ{§É±à½Í±´¨s°ê¤¤¾Ç¥Í¹ï¤O¾Ç·§©Àªº¥t¦³¬[ºc¡C¬ì¾Ç±Ð¨|, 1, 37-59

³¯­^¼_(¥Á83)¡C¤£¦P¾Ç²ß¼Ò¦¡¹ï¾Ç¥Í¾Ç²ß¡y¤ë¬Û¬ÕÁ«¡z¤§¼vÅT¡A°ê¥ß¥xÆW®v½d¤j¾Ç¦a²y¬ì¾Ç¬ã¨s©ÒºÓ¤h½×¤å¡C

³¯¬Õ¦N(2004): ±´¨s°ÊºAÃþ¤ñ¹ï©ó¬ì¾Ç·§©À¾Ç²ß»P·§©À§ïÅܾúµ{¤§¬ã¨s-¥H°ê¤G¾Ç¥Í¾Ç²ß®ðÅé²É¤l·§©À¬°¨Ò¡C°ê¥ß¥xÆW®v½d¤j¾Ç¬ì¾Ç±Ð¨|¬ã¨s©ÒºÓ¤h½×¤å(¥¼¥Xª©)¡C

¸³¥¿¬Â¡B³¢­«¦N(1992): ±´¨s°ê¤p¨àµ£¹B°Ê»P¤O·§©Àªº¥t¦³¬[ºc¡C¬ì¾Ç±Ð¨|, 3,93-121¡C

¶À«T¾§¡B·¨¤åª÷¡]2000¡^: ±q¦P¾«¤¬°ÊªºÆ[ÂI°Q½×¤¤¾Ç²z¤Æ¹êÅç½Ò¤§±Ð¾Ç¦w±Æ¡Cª«²z±Ð¨|¡A4(1)¡A19-31¡Cdoi:10.6212/CPE.2000.0401.02¡C

¼B·s¡BªL¦pØþ¡B§õ¨q¥É¡B·¨¶²¥P¡B±i¥Ã¹F(2006): ¤p²Õ¦X§@¾Ç²ßªº±Ð¾Ç²z©À»P¹ê°È¡A»OÆW®v½d¤j¾Ç¬ì¾Ç±Ð¨|¤¤¤ß¡A¬ì¾Ç±Ð¨|¤ë¥Z¡A294¡A34-46¡C

³¯«Û§Ê¡B±d¤ì§ø¡B¬h½å(2010) ¡C¦P¾«¹ï¸Ü«P¶i¨â¦ì°ê¤¤¼Æ¾Ç±Ð®v±Ð¾Ç¤Ï«ä»P±M·~¦¨ªø¡C¬ì¾Ç±Ð¨|¾Ç¥Z¡A18(4)¡A331-359¡C

³¯«H§U¡B³¯¥¿ªv¡B¼B¹Å¯ø¡]2016¡^¡C¹B¥Î·§©À§ïÅܱоǵ¦²¤¹ï¤j¾Ç¥Í¦b¬ì¾Ç¾Ç²ß¦¨®Ä¤§±´°Q¡C¸ü©ó¥xÆW¤uµ{±Ð¨|»PºÞ²z¾Ç·|¡]¥D½s¡^¡A¤uµ{»P¬ì§Þ±Ð¨|¾Ç³N¬ã°Q·|½×¤å¶°¡]99-118­¶¡^¡C¥xÆW¡G¥xÆW¤uµ{±Ð¨|»PºÞ²z¾Ç·|¡Cdoi:10.6571/CETE.2016.05.08

Alles, D. L. (2005). The nature of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 67(1), 7-10.

Au, T. K. (1994). Developing an intuitive understanding of substance kinds. Cognitive Psychology, 27(1), 71-111.

Caravitam S., & Halldén, O. (1994). Re-framing the problem of conceptual change [special issue]. Learning and Instruction, 4, 89-111.

Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

Carey, S. (1986, April). Cognitive science and science education.  American Psychologist, 41(10),1123-1130.

Carey, S. (1991). Knowledge acquisition: Enrichment or conceptual change? In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.), The epigenesist of mind (pp. 257-291). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Carey, S., & Spelke, E. (1994). Domain-specific knowledge and conceptual change. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 169-200). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Chi, M. T., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P. & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations:How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.

Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., &  LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self- explanation sim-proves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.

Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D., & de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction: The Joumal of the European Association for search on Learning and Instruction, 4, 27-43.

Champagnek, A. B., Klopfer, L. E.,& Anderson, J. H. (1980). Factors influencing the learning of classical mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 48, 1074-1079.

Champagnek, A. B., Klopfer, L. E. (1982).A cusal model of students achievement in a college physics course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19, 299-309.

Chan, C. C., Tsui, M. S., & Chan, M. Y. C. (2002). Applying the structure of the observed learning outcomes (SOLO) taxonomy on students’ learning outcomes: an empirical study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(6).

Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive Models of Science: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, (pp.129-186). University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis, MN.

Chi, M. T. H. & Roscoe, R.D. (2002). The processes and challenges of conceptual change. In M. Limon and L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 3-27.

Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S. A., & Jeong, H. (2004). Can tutors monitor students’ understanding accurately? Cognition and Instruction, 22(3), 363-387.

Chinn, C. A. & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1-49.

Clark, D. B. (2006). Longitudinal conceptual change in students’ understanding of thermal equilibrium: An examination of the process of conceptual restructuring. Cognition and Instruction, 24(4), 467-563.

Clement, J. (1989). Learning via model construction and criticism. In G. Glover, R. Ronning & C. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity, assessment, theory and research. New York: Plenum.

Clement, J. (2000). Model based learning as a key research area for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1041-1053.

Cobern, W. W. (1993). Contextual Constructivism: The Impact of Culture on the Learning and Teaching of Science, In K. Tobin (ED.), The Practice of  Constructivism in Science Education, (pp51-70). Washington, D. C.: AAAS Press.

Cohen, G. (1983). The psychology of cognition. New York: Academic Press, Inc.

Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1987). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Learning, knowing, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. University Press.

diSessa, A. A., Gillespie, N. M., & Esterly, J. B. (2004). Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force. Cognitive Science, 28(6), 843-900.

Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2007). Learning electromagnetism with visualizations and active learning. In J. K. Gilbert (Eds.), Visualization in Science Education (pp. 187-216). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphor in learning science. Science Education, 75(6), 649-672.

Duit, R., & Glynn, S. (1996). Mental modeling. In G. Welford, J. Osborne, & P. Scott (Eds.), Research in science education in Europe (pp. 166-176). London: Falmer Press.

Dykstra, D. I., Boyle, C. R., & Monarch, I. A. (1992). Studying conceptual change in learning physics. Science Education, 76(6), 615-652.

Eckstein, S. G., & Shemesh, M. (1989). Development of children’s ideas on motion: Intuition vs. logical thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 327-336.

Fensham, P.J. & Kass, H. (1988). Inconsistent or discrepant events in science instruction. Studies in Science Education, 15, 1-16.

Finegold M., & Gorsky, P. (1991). Students’ concepts of force as applied to related physical systems: A search for consistency. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 97-113.

Finegold, M., & Grosky, P. (1988). Learning about forces: Simulating the outcomes of pupils’ misconceptions. Physics all Science, 17, 251-261.

Franco, C., de Barros, H. L., Colinvaux, D., Krapas, S., Queiroz, G., & Alves, F. (1999). From scientists’ and inventors’ minds to some scientific and technological products: relationships between theories, models, mental models and conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 21(3), 277-291.

Gilbert, J., & Boulter, C. (1998). Learning science through models and modeling. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds), International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 52-66).

Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science education: conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 799-822.

Hashweh, M. Z. (1986).Toward an explanation of conceptual change. European Journal of Science Education, 8(3), 229-249.

Hewson, P. W., Zeichner, K. M., Tabachnick, B. R., Blomker, K. B., & Toolin, R. (1992). A conceptual change approach to science teacher education at the University Wisconsin-Madison. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

Howe, C. (1981). Acquiring language in a conversational context. London: Academic Press.

Howe, C., Tolmie, A., & Mackenzie, M. (1995). Collaborative learning in physics: Some implications for computer design. In C. O'Malley (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 51-68). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Howe, C. (2010). Peer groups and children’s development. Oxford: Blackwell.

Hestenes, D. (1995). Modeling software for learning and doing physics. In Bernardini, C., Tarsitani, C., & Vincentini, M. (Eds.). Thinking physics for teaching. (pp. 25-66.) New York: Plenum.

Justi, R. S. & Gilbert, J. K. (2003). Teachers’ views on the nature of models. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1369-1386.

Kember, D., Jones, A., Loke, A., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., Tse, H., et al. (1999). Determining the level of reflective thinking from students’ written journals using a coding scheme based on the work of Mezirow. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 18(1), 18-31.

Klausmeier, H. J. (1974). Conceptual Learning and Development. New York Academic Press.

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of arguments. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Meheut, M. (2004). Designing and validating two teaching-learning sequences about particle models. International Journal of Science Education, 26(5), 605-618.

Novak, J. D. (1988). Learning science and the science of learning. Studies in Science Education, 15, 77-101.

Ohlsson, S. (1984). Induced strategy shifts in spatial reasoning.  Acta Psychologica, 57, 46-67.

Paul, T. (1992). Conceptual Revolutions. New Jersey: Longevity of the Council on Library Resources.

Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.

Pella, M. O. (1975). Concept of concept. University of Wisconsin-Madison Press.

Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.

Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.

Posner, G.J. & Strike, K. A. (1985). A Conceptual Change View of Learning and Understanding. In L. H. T. West & A.L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change. New York: Academic Press, INC., pp.211-232.

Rumelhard, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1981). Accretion, tuning and restructuring: Three modes of learning. Jn R. Klatsky & J. W. Cotton (Eds.) Semantic factor in cognition. Hollsdale, NJ: Lawren Eribaum Associates.  

Scott, P.H., Mortimer, E.F., & Aguiar, O.G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90, 605-631.

Schwarz, C. V., & White, B. Y. (2005). Metamodeling knowledge: developing students' understanding of scientific modeling. Cognition & Instruction, 23(2), 165-205.

Sins, P. H. M., Savelsbergh, E. R., & Joolingen, W. R. V. (2005). The Difficult Process of Scientific Modeling: An analysis of novices’ reasoning during computer-based modeling. International Journal of Science Education, 27(14), 1695-1721.

Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Toulmin, S (1972). Human understanding. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Wandersee,J.H. (1993). The declared research interests of NARST members: An analysis of the 1992 NARST ”Directory of Members. ”J.R.S.T.30, pp.319-320.

Vosniadou  S  &  Brewer, W. F. (1987). Theories of knowledge restructuring in development. Review of Education research, 57, 51-67.

Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (1999). Teacher’s knowledge of models and modeling in science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(11), 1141-1154.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Development of science concepts in childhood. In E. Hanfman & G. Vakar (Eds), Thought and Language (pp. 82-118). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

 

 

 


Copyright (C) 2017 EdUHK APFSLT.Volume 18, Issue 1, Article 11 (Jun., 2017). All Rights Reserved.