Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 17, Issue 1, Article 11 (Jun., 2016)
Özlem KORAY
Pre-service science teachers’ opinions about using the feedback process in the preparation of teaching materials

Previous Contents


References

Attali, Y., Powers, D. (2008). Effect of immediate feedback and revision on psychometric properties of open-ended GRE subject test items. GRE Board Research Report No. 04-05, 1-23.

Attali, Y., Laitusis, C., Stone, E. (2015). Differences in reaction to immediate feedback and opportunity to revise answers for multiple-choice and open-ended questions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1–16.

Black, P., William, D. (1998). Assesment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5 (1).

Bose, J., Rengel, Z. (2009). A model formative assessment strategy to promote student-centered self-regulated learning in higher education. US-China Education Review. 6(12), 29-35.

Brown, S.(2004). Assessment for Learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 81-89.

Burnett, C.P. Mandel, V.(2010). Praise and feedback in the primary classroom: teachers’ and students’ perspectives. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 10, 145-154.

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E.K., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş., Demirel, F. (2012). Scientifiic Research Methods. Pegem Academy, Ankara.

Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233.

Decristan, J., Klieme, E., Kunter, M., Hochweber, J., Büttner, G., Fauth, B., Hondrich, A.L., Rieser, S., Hertel, S., Hardy, I.(2015). Embedded Formative Assessment and Classroom Process Quality: How Do They Interact in Promoting Science Understanding? American Educational Research Journal, 52, 1133-1159.

Demir, S., Bedir, G. (2005). Students’ assessment of instructional strategies and activities used by science and social studies teachers in primary schools. Educational Administration: Theory and Practise, 44, 473–488.

Demiraslan-Çevik, Y. (2014). Who is more satisfied: assesse or assessor? students’ views on online peer feedback. Journal of Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education, 3(1), 10–23.

Erişen, Y. (1997). Fulfillment levels of instructor feedback and correction of behavior. Educational Administration, 3(1), 45–61.

Gibbs, G., Simpson, C. (2003). Measuring the response of students to assessment: the Assessment Experience Questionnaire, Paper presented at the 11th Improving Student Learning Symposium.

Gibbs, G., Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3-31.

Hattie, J., Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77 (1), 81–112.

Heritage, M. (2007). Formative Assessment: What Do Teachers Need to Know and Do?. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(2), 140-145.

Higgins, R. Hartley, P., Skelton, A. (2002). The Conscientious Consumer: reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 53-64.

Johnson, B., Christensen, L. (2012). Educational Research.Ouantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Approaches (4th Ed.). California: Sage Publications.

Jones, C. A. (2005). Assessment for learning, Learning and Skills Development Agency. Vocational Learning Support Programme, 16–19, 1-41.

Liu N.F., Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279-290.

Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2th Ed). California: Sage Publications.

Nicol, D.J., Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.

OECD, (2005). Formative Assessment: Improving Learning in Secondary Classrooms, Policy Brief. [Online] www.oecd.org/publications/Policybriefs, 1-8.

OECD/CERI (2008). Assessment for Learning Formative Assessment. Paper presented at the OECD/CERI International Conference “Learning in the 21st Century:Research, Innovation and Policy”.

Oğuz, A. (1993). The effect of the level of access to clues and feedback-correction process in science education. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Anadolu University Institute of Social Sciences, Eskişehir.

Retna, K.S., Cavana, R.Y.(2009). Preliminary analysis of students’ perceptions of feedback in a New Zealand University, Paper presented at the OECD and Istanbul Technical University “What works” Conference on Quality Teaching in Higher Education Conference.

Shute, V. J. (2007). Focus on formative feedback. Research Report. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Sönmez, V. (2007). Teachers’ handbook in program development Program geliştirmede öğretmen el kitabı. (13th Ed.). Ankara: Anı Publications.

Taras, M. (2002). Using Assessment for Learning and Learning from Assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(6), 501-510.

Taras, M. (2003). To feedback or not to feedback in student self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28 (5), 549-565.

Tok, Ş. (2007). Teaching-learning strategies and models. Doğanay, A. (Ed.), Teaching principles and methods. (2th Ed.). Ankara: Pegem A Publications.

Weaver, M.R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 379–394.

Yıldırım, A., Şimşek, H. (2008). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. (7th Ed.) Ankara: Seçkin Publications.

 

 


Copyright (C) 2016 EdUHK APFSLT. Volume 17, Issue 1, Article 11 (Jun., 2016). All Rights Reserved.