Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 17, Issue 1, Article 4 (Jun., 2016)
Ángel VÁZQUEZ-ALONSO, María-Antonia MANASSERO-MAS, Antonio GARCÍA-CARMONA and Marisa MONTESANO DE TALAVERA
Diagnosing conceptions about the epistemology of science: Contributions of a quantitative assessment methodology

Previous Contents Next


References

Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012a). Examining the sources for our understandings about science: Enduring conflations and critical issues in research on nature of science in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 353-374.

Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012b). Nature of science in science education: Toward a coherent framework for synergistic research and development. In B. J. Fraser et al. (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 1041-1060). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students’ view of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057-1095.

Acevedo, J. A. (2009). Conocimiento didáctico del contenido para la enseñanza de la naturaleza de la ciencia (II): una perspectiva. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 6(2), 164–189.

Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York, NY: Columbia University.

Aikenhead, G. S., & Ryan, A. G. (1992). The development of a new instrument: Views on Science-Technology-Society (VOSTS). Science Education, 76(5), 477-491.

Aikenhead, G. S., Fleming, R. G., & Ryan, A. G. (1987). High school graduates' beliefs about science-technology-society. I. Methods and issues in monitoring students’ views. Science Education, 71, 145-161.

Aikenhead, G. S., Ryan, A. G., & Fleming, R. W. (1989). Views on Science-Technology-Society (form CDN.mc.5). Saskatoon, Canada: University of Saskatchewan. Retrieved from http://www.usask.ca/education/people/aikenhead/vosts.pdf.

Akerson, V., & Donnelly, L. A. (2010) Teaching nature of science to K-2 students: What understandings can they attain? International Journal of Science Education, 32, 97-124.

Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95, 518–542.

Botton, C., & Brown, C. (1998). The reliability of some VOSTS items when used with preservice secondary science teachers in England. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 53-71.

Brunner, J., Summers, R., Myers, J. Y., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2016). Toward quantifying responses to the Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Empirically investigating qualitative coding. NARST 2016 Annual International Conference Abstracts (pp. 126-127). Retrieved from https://www.narst.org/annualconference/2016conference.cfm

Chen, S., Chang, W-H., Lieu, S.-C., Kao, H.-L., Huang, M.-T., & Lin, S.-F., (2013). Development of an empirically based questionnaire to investigate young students’ ideas about nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(4), 408–430.

Cobern, W. W., & Loving, C. C. (2002). Investigation of preservice elementary teachers' thinking about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 1016-1031.

Coll, R. K. (2012). Foreword. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Advances in nature of science research (p. v). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

Deng, F., Chen, D.-T., Tsai, C-C, & Chai, C.-S. (2011). Students’ views of the nature of science: A critical review of research. Science Education, 95, 961–999.

Dogan, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2008). Turkish grade 10 students’ and science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A national study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(10), 1083–1112.

Eagly, A.H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.

Erduran, S., & Dagher, R. F. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

Eurydice (2011). Science education in Europe: National policies, practices and research. Retrieved from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice

García-Carmona, A., Vázquez, A., & Manassero, M. A. (2011). Estado actual y perspectivas de la enseñanza de la naturaleza de la ciencia: una revisión de las creencias y obstáculos del profesorado. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 29(3), 403-412.

García-Carmona, A., Vázquez, A., & Manassero, M. A. (2012). Comprensión de los estudiantes sobre naturaleza de la ciencia: análisis del estado actual de la cuestión y perspectivas. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 30(1), 23-34.

Halloun, I., & Hestenes, D. (1998). Interpreting VASS dimensions and profiles for physics students. Science & Education, 7(6), 553-577.

Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Akerson, V. L. (2011). Elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching nature of science. Science Education, 95(1), 145–167.

Kind, P., & Barmby, P. (2011). Defending attitude scales. In I. M. Saleh & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Attitude research in science education: Classic and contemporary measurements (pp. 117-135). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831-879). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Lederman, N. G., Wade, P. D., & Bell, R. L. (1998). Assessing understanding of the nature of science: A historical perspective. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 331-350). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

Lederman, N.G., & O’Malley, M. (1990). Students’ perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change. Science Education, 74, 225–239.

Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. (2002). Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497–521.

Liu, S.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2008). Differences in the scientific epistemological views of undergraduate students. International Journal of Science Education, 30(8), 1055 – 1073.

Liu, X. (2012). Developing measurement instruments for science education research. In B.J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 651-666), Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

Manassero, M. A., Vázquez, A., & Acevedo, J. A. (2003a). Cuestionario de opiniones sobre ciencia, tecnologia i societat (COCTS). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Manassero, M. A., Vázquez, A., & Acevedo, J. A. (2003b). Views on science-technology-society questionnaire: Categories and applications. Paper presented at the 4th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) on the Research and the Quality of Science Education, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands.

Matthews, M. R. (2012). Changing the focus: From nature of science (NOS) to features of science (FOS). In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Advances in nature of science research. Concepts and methodologies (pp. 3-26). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.  

Next Generation Science Standards [NGSS] (2013). The next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692 – 720.

Rubba, P. A., Schoneweg-Bradford, C., & Harkness, W. L. (1996). A new scoring procedure for the Views on Science-Technology-Society instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 18(4), 387-400.

Ryan, A. G., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1992). Students’ preconceptions about the epistemology of science. Science Education, 76, 559–580.

Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). A series of misrepresentations: A response to Allchin’s whole approach to assessing nature of science understandings. Science Education, 96, 685–692.

Tedman, D. K., & Keeves, J. P. (2001). The development of scales to measure students’ teachers’ and scientists’ views on STS. International Education Journal, 2, 20-48.

Vázquez, A., & Manassero, M. A. (1999). Response and scoring models for the ‘Views on Science-Technology-Society’ Instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 21(3), 231-247.

Vázquez, A., García-Carmona, A., Manassero, M. A., & Bennàssar, A. (2013). Spanish Secondary-School Science Teachers' Beliefs about Science-Technology-Society (STS) Issues. Science & Education, 22(5), 1191-1218.

Vázquez, A., García-Carmona, A., Manassero, M. A., & Bennàssar, A. (2014). Spanish students’ conceptions about NOS and STS issues: A diagnostic study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(1), 33-45.

Vázquez, A., Manassero, M. A. & Acevedo, J. A. (2006). An Analysis of Complex Multiple Choice Science-Technology-Society Items: Methodological Development and Preliminary Results. Science Education, 90(4), 681-706.

 

 


Copyright (C) 2016 EdUHK APFSLT. Volume 17, Issue 1, Article 4 (Jun., 2016). All Rights Reserved.