Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 15, Issue 2, Article 4 (Dec., 2014)
Ayşe SERT ÇIBIK
Investigation of primary education second level students’ motivations toward science learning in terms of various factors

Previous Contents


References

Akpınar, B., Batdı, V., & Dönder, A. (2013). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin fen bilgisi öğrenimine yönelik motivasyon düzeylerinin cinsiyet ve sınıf değişkenine göre değerlendirilmesi. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 2(1), 15-26.

Albertus, M., Bolte, C., & Bertels, N. (2012). Analyzing the relevance of science education from students’ perspectives regarding developmental tasks, self and prototype attitudes and motivation. Bolte, C., Holbrook, J., & Rauch, F. (2012; Eds.). Inquiry-based Science Education in Europe: Reflections from the PROFILES Project. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin. Print: University of Klagenfurt (Austria), 75-78.

Arlı, M., & Nazik, M. H. (2001). Bilimsel araştırmaya giriş. Gazi Kitabevi, Ankara.

Belo, N. A. H., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2010). Teachers' beliefs about making physics engaging and comprehensible for secondary students in The Netherlands. In: Taşar, M. F. & Çakmakçı, G. (Eds.), Contemporary Science Education Research: Teaching (pp. 29-39). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.

Bertels, N., & Bolte, C. (2010). Occupational orientation–a foreign concept to chemistry lessons. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of NARST, Philadelphia, USA.

Bolte, C. (1995). Conception and application of a learning climate questionnaire based on motivational interest con-cepts for chemistry instruction at German schools. In D.L. Fisher (Ed.), The Study of Learning Environments (pp. 182-192). Vol. 8. Perth, Australia: Curtin University.

Bolte, C. (2006). Evaluating science instruction by using the motivational learning environment questionnaire. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the AERA, San Francisco, USA.

Bolte, C. (2007). Assessment for the adaptation of the PARSEL materials in practice-selected by the PARSEL group of Freie Universität Berlin. Teaching-learning materials compiled by the PARSEL consortium as part of an EC FP6 funded Project (SAS6-CT-2006-042922-PARSEL).

Bolte, C. (2012). How to analyze and assess students’ motivation for learning chemistry. Student active learning in science. Collection of papers SALIS Final Conference. 29-30 August 2012. pp. (85-92). Tbilisi, Georgia.

Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, race, and gender in middle school science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7, 271-285.

Brophy, J. (1987). Synthesis of research on strategies for motivating students to learn. Educational Leadership, October, 40-48.

Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabi: İstatistik, araştirma deseni SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum. (8. Baskı). Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Yayınları.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. 5th Edition, London: Routledge Falmer.

Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. (2th Edition), New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale.

DEU-PROFILES Working Group (2011). http://www.profiles-deu.net/. [Accessed 18 October 2013].

Duit, R., & Treagust, D. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671-688.

EURYDICE (2011). Science education in Europe: National policies, practices and research. Education, audiovisual and culture executive agency. [Online] Available at: http://eacea.ec.europa.eu. [Accessed 19 December 2013].

Ferk Savec, V., & Devetak, I. (2013). Evaluating the effectiveness of students’ active learning in chemistry. 4th International Conference on New Horizons in Education, INTE 2013 Proceedings Book Volume 1. (pp.1168-1175), Rome, Italy.

Fraenkel, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Freedman-Doan, C., Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Blumenfeld, P., Arbreton, A., & Harold, R. D. (2000). What am I best at? Grade and gender differences in children's beliefs about ability improvement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(4), 379-402.

Glynn, S. M., & Koballa, T. R. Jr. (2006). Motivation to learn in college science. In J.J. Mintzes & W. H. Leonard (Eds.), Handbook of college science teaching (pp. 25-32). Arlington,VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.

Gonzalez-DeHass, A. R., Willems, P. P., & Holbein, M. F. D. (2005). Examining the relationship between parental involvement and student motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 99-123.

Güngören, S. (2009). The effect of grade level on elementary school students’ motivational beliefs in science. Master’s Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

Güvercin, Ö., Tekkaya, C., & Sungur, S. (2010). A cross age study of elementary students’ motivation towards science learning. H. U. Journal of Education, 39, 233-243.

Hilker, J. B. (1993). Toward creating the intrinsically motivating classroom: Can students’ motivational orientations be changed?. American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. Report No. ED 359166.

Jacobsen, D. A., Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2002). Methods for teaching, promoting student learning (6th Ed.). New Jersey: Meririll Prentice Hall.

Lee, O., & Brophy, J. (1996). Motivational patterns observed in sixth-grade science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(3), 585-610.

Lightbody, P., Sienn, G., Stocks, R. & Walsh, D. (1996). Motivation and attribution at secondary school: The role of gender. Educational Studies, 22, 13-25.

Meredith, J. E., Fortner, R. W., & Mullins, G. W. (1997). Model of affective learning for nonformal science education facilities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(8), 805-818.

Ministry of Education (MEB), (2010). PISA 2009 Ulusal ön rapor. Ankara: EARGED Yayınları. Ministry of Education (MEB), (2012). 12 yıl zorunlu eğitim sorular-cevaplar. Ankara. Online Available at: http://www.meb.gov.tr/duyurular/duyurular2012/12Yil_Soru_Cevaplar.pdf [Accessed 18 August 2014].

Özceylan, D., & Coşkun, E. (2012). Türkiye’deki illerin sosyo-ekonomik gelişmişlik düzeyleri ve afetlerden sosyal ve ekonomik zarar görebilirlikleri arasındaki ilişki. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 41(1), 31-46.

Pallant, J. (2001). The SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (version 10). St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

Pintrich, P., & Zusho, A. (2002). Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom. In J. C. Smart & W. G. Tierney (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp.55-128). Boston: Kluwer.

ROSE (The Relevance of Science Education), 2010. ROSE questionnaire. [Online] Available at: http://www.ils.uio.no/english/rose/key-documents/questionnaire.html [Accessed 12 December 2013].

Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.

Şenler, B., & Sungur, S. (2009). Parental influences on students’ self-concept, task value beliefs, and achievement in science. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12, 106-117.

Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323-332.

Tavşancıl, E. (2002). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.

Telli, S., den Brok, P. J., & Cakiroglu, J. (2010). The importance of the teacher-student interpersonal relationship for Turkish students’ attitudes towards science. Research in Science & Technological Education (RSTE), 28(3), 237-252.

Thompson, T. L., & Mintzes, J. J. (2002). Cognitive structure and the affective domain: On knowing and feeling in biology. International Journal of Science Education, 24(6), 645-660.

Üredi, İ., & Erden, M. (2009). Öz-düzenleme stratejileri ve motivasyonel inançlarının yordayıcısı olarak algılanan anne baba tutumları. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(4), 781-811.

Velayutham, S., Aldrıdge, J. M., & Fraser, B. (2012). Gender differences in student motivation and self-regulation in science learning: A multi-group structural equation modeling analysis. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 1347-1368.

Wolters, C. A., & Rosenthal, H. (2000). The relation between students’ motivational beliefs and their use of motivational regulation strategies. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 801-820.

Yaman, S., & Dede, Y. (2007). Öğrencilerin fen ve teknoloji ve matematik dersine yönelik motivasyon düzeylerinin bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 52, 615-638.

Yenice, N., Saydam, G., & Telli, S. (2012). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin fen öğrenmeye yönelik motivasyonlarını etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 13(2), 231-247.

Yılmaz, H., & Çavaş, P. H. (2007). Reliability and validity study of the students’ motivation toward science learning questionnaire (in Turkish). Elementary Education Online, 6(3), 430-440.

 


Copyright (C) 2014 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 15, Issue 2, Article 4 (Dec., 2014). All Rights Reserved.