Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 15, Issue 1, Article 9 (Jun., 2014)
Mustafa Serdar KÖKSAL and Kari SORMUNEN
Advanced science students’ understanding on nature of science in Turkey

Previous Contents


References

Berberoğlu, G & Kalender, I (2005). Investigation of student achievement across years, school types and regios: The SSE and PISA analyses. Educational Sciences and Practice, 4(7), 21-35.

Blanco, R. & Niaz, M. (1997). Epistemological beliefs of students and teachers about the nature of science: from ‘baconian inductive ascent’ to the ‘irrelevance’ of scientific laws. Instructional Science, 25, 203-231.

Çelik, A.(2004). AB ülkeleri ve Türkiye’de gelir eşitsizliği: piyasa dağılımı-yeniden dağılım. Çalışma ve Toplum, 3.

Damastes S. & Wandersee, J.H. (1992). Biological literacy in a college biology classroom BioScience42, (1 ), 63-65.

Dogan, N.,& Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2008). Turkish grade 10 students' and science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: A national study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(10), 1083-1112.

Geban, O, Ertepınar,H., Yılmaz, G., Atlan, A. & Şahpaz, F. (1994) The effect of computer assisted learning on students, achievement and attitudes. The Proceedings of First National Science Education Symposium. Buca Fakulty of Education, Izmir, Turkey.

Irez, S. (2006). Are we prepared?: An assessment of preservice science teacher educators’ beliefs about nature of science. Science Teacher Education, 90 (6), 1113-1143.

Khishfe, R & Lederman, N.G. (2007). Relationship between instructional context and views of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29 (8), 939-962.

Khishfe, R & Lederman, N.G. (2006).Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: Integrated versus non-integrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 43, (4), 395-418.

Kılıç, K., Sungur, S., Çakıroğlu, J. & Tekkaya, C. (2005). Ninth Grade Students’ Understanding of the Nature of Scientific Knowledge, Hacettepe University Education Faculty Journal28, 127-133.

Lederman, N.G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L. & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6),497-521.

Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research in Science Education. Englewood cliffs, NJ: Erlbaum Publishers. pp.831-880.

McComas, W. F. (1998). The Principle Elements of the Nature of Science: Dispelling the Myths. In W.F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 53–70). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

McComas, M.R. (2003)A textbook case of the nature of science: Laws and theories in the science of biology.  International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1, 141–155.

Meyling, H. (1997). How to change students’ conceptions of the epistemology of science. Science & Education, 6, 397-416.

Neber, H. & Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). Self-regulated science learning with highly gifted students: the role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables. High Ability Studies, 13(1), 59-74.

OECD (2004). Education at a Glance. OECD, Paris.

Özaslan, H, Yıldız, N & Çetin,Y (2009). Üstün Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Yetenekleri Dışındaki Mesleklere Yönelme Nedenleri ve Sakıncaları. Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar II. Ulusal Kongresi, 25-27 Mart, Anadolu University, Eskişehir, Turkey.

Özgün-Koca, S.A. & Şen, A.İ. (2002). Evaluation of the results of third international mathematics and science study for Turkey. Hacettepe University Education Faculty Journal, 23, 145-154.

Palmquist, B. & Finley, F. (1997). Preservice teachers’ views of the nature of science during a postbaccalaureate science teaching program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 595-615.

Schommer, M & Dunnell, P. A . (1994). A comparison of epistemological beliefs between gifted and non-gifted high school students. Roeper Review, 16(3).

Thomas, J. A. (2008). An analysis of epistemological change by gender and ethnicity among gifted high school students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, (1), 87-98.

Tsai, C. (2006). Reinterpreting and reconstructing science: Teachers’ view changes towards the nature of science by courses of science education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 363-375.

Tuan, H, Chin, C & Sheh, S (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27,(6), 634-659.

TÜİK (2008). Adrese dayalı nüfus kayıt sistemi; 2007 nüfus sayımı sonuçları. TÜİK Haber Bülteni, 9.

Yılmaz, H & Çavaş, Huyugüzel, P. (2007). Reliability and Validity Study of the Students’ Motivation toward Science Learning (SMTSL) Questionnaire. Elementary Education Online, 6(3), 430–440.

 


Copyright (C) 2014 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 15, Issue 1, Article 9 (Jun., 2014). All Rights Reserved.