Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 13, Issue 2, Article 9 (Dec., 2012)
Qun XIE and Winnie Wing Mui SO
Understanding and practice of argumentation: A pilot study with Mainland Chinese pre-service teachers in secondary science classrooms

Previous Contents


References

Blackburn, S. (2005). Blackburn, S. (2005). (2nd ed.). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Blosser, P. E. (1973). Handbook of effective questioning techniques. Worthington, OH: Education Associates, Inc.

Bricker, L. A., & Bell, P. (2008). Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education. Science Education, 92(3), 473-498.

Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Students' questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 883-908.

Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. D. (2007). Personally-seeded discussions to scaffold online argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 29(3), 253-277.

Dawson, V. M., & Venville, G. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing students' argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school genetics. in Science Education, 40(2), 133-148.

Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J., (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287.

Durant, J. R., Evans, G. A., & Thomas, G. P. (1989). The Public Understanding of Science. Nature, 340, 11-14.

Erduran, S., Ardac, D., Yakmaci-Guzel. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Case studies of pre-service secondary science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education,2(2), 1-14

Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915-933.

Jiménez -Aleixandre, M. P., Bugallo Rodríguez, A., & Duschl, R. A., (2000). 'Doing the lesson' or 'doing science': Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757.

Kuhn, D., (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77, 319-337

Lawson, A. E. (2002). Sound and faulty arguments generated by preservice biology teachers when testing hypotheses involving unobservable entities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 237-252.

Lawson, A. E. (2003). The nature and development of hypothetico-predictive argumentation with implications for science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1387-1408.

Maloney, J., & Simon, S. (2006). Mapping children's discussions of evidence in science to assess collaboration and argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1817-1841.

Martin, A., & Hand, B. (2009). Factors affecting the implementation of argument in the elementary science classroom. A longitudinal case study. Research in Science Education, 39((1), 17-38.

McNeill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation. Science Education, 94(2), 203-229.

Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020.

Sampson, V. and Gerbino, F. (2010). Two instructional models that teachers can use to promote and support scientific argumentation in the biology classroom. The American Biology Teacher, 72(7), 427-431

Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 235-260.

Toulmin, S. E. (1958) The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004).A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma- dialectical approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.

von Aufschnaiter, C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2008). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students' argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge.Journal of Research in Science Teaching(1), 101-131.

Zohar, A. (2008). Science teacher education and professional development in argumentation. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.). Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research. (pp. 245-268), Dordrecht: Springer.


Copyright (C) 2012 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 13, Issue 2, Article 9 (Dec., 2012). All Rights Reserved.