Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 13, Issue 2, Article 3 (Dec., 2012)
Sibel OZSOY, Hamide ERTEPINAR and Necdet SAGLAM
Can eco-schools improve elementary school students’ environmental literacy levels?

Previous Contents Next


Inferential Statistics

Research Question 1: Are there significant mean differences between experimental and control group students with respect to their environmental knowledge?

To determine whether EG and CG students differ with respect to their environmental knowledge, independent samples t-tests are conducted for each grade level. The results showed that there is a significant mean difference between mean scores of 6th grade (t (115) = 7.059, p = .000, η2 = .30) 7th grade (t(116) = 3.041, p = .003, η2 = .07) and 8th grade (t(79) = 9.443, p = .000, η2 = .53) students enrolling eco-school and traditional school on their knowledge about environment. Results also revealed that means of EG students are higher than means of CG students for all grade levels. Table 4 represents the results of t-tests run for students’ environmental knowledge scores.

Table 4 Results of t-tests run for students’ environmental knowledge scores.

Grade Level

Group

N

M

SD

t

p

η2

6th Grade

EG

70

6.585

2.095

7.059

.000

.30

 

CG

47

3.638

2.381

 

 

 

7th Grade

EG

45

5.577

2.544

3.041

.003

.07

 

CG

73

4.205

2.088

 

 

 

8th Grade

EG

41

7.853

1.236

9.443

.000

.53

 

CG

40

4.100

2.216

 

 

 

Research Question 2: Are there significant mean differences between experimental and control group students with respect to their environmental attitudes?

To answer the second research question, for 6th and 7th grades analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), for 8th grade independent sample t-test were run. The ANCOVA results revealed that there is a significant mean difference between 6th grade EG and CG students with respect to their attitudes toward environment subscale (F(1,114) = 13.597, p = .000) with a large effect size (partial η2 = .107). For this subscale, EG students got higher scores (M = 32.614, SD = 4.79) than CG (M = 27.148, SD = 8.88). ANCOVA results also showed that there is no significant mean difference between 7th grade treatment groups with respect to their attitudes toward environment (F(1,115) = 34.023, p = .344). The analysis run for 8th grade students showed that there is a significant mean difference between groups in favor of EG (t(79) = 8.096, p = .000) with large effect size (η2 = .45). After the application, eco-school students (M = 36.585, SD = 3.701) had higher attitudes toward environment than traditional school students (M = 26.700, SD = 6.801).

Research Question 3: Are there significant mean differences between experimental and control group students with respect to their environmental uses?

To analyze whether there is a significant mean difference between students enrolling at two different treatment groups, with respect to their environmental use scores, ANCOVAs were run for each grade level (see Table 5). Results revealed that there is a significant mean difference between 6th grade (F(1,114) = 46.195, p = .000, η2 = .28), 7th grade (F(1,115) = 10.325, p = .002, η2 = .082) and 8th grade (F(1,78) = 106.934, p = .000, η2 = .578), treatment groups with respect to their environmental use scores. For all the three grade levels eco-school students (for 6th grade M = 70.385, SD = 9.507, for 7th grade M = 63.355, SD = 7.997; for 8th grade M = 71.975, SD = 3.778) got higher scores than traditional school students (for 6th grade M = 53.063, SD = 15.022; for 7th grade M = 59.465, SD = 10.478; for 8th grade M = 46.050, SD = 15.028).

Table 5 ANCOVA Summary for 8th Grade Students’ Environmental Use Scores

Group

Source

SS

Df

MS

F

P

Partial Eta Squared (η2)

6th Grade

Covariate

(pre-EU Scores)

998.688

1

998.688

7.289

.008

.060

Group

6328.956

1

6328.956

46.195

.000

.288

Group*pre-EU Scores

41.342

1

41.342

.300

.585

.003

Error

15618.707

114

137.006

 

 

 

Total

495749

117

 

 

 

 

7th Grade

Covariate

(pre-EU Scores)

15.760

1

15.760

.169

.681

.001

Group

961.123

1

961.123

10.325

.002

.082

Group*pre-EU Scores

6.677

1

6.677

.071

.790

.001

Error

10704.715

115

93.084

 

 

 

Total

461072

118

 

 

 

 

8th Grade

Covariate

(pre-EU Scores)

9.317

1

9.317

.078

.781

.001

Group

12845.187

1

12845.187

106.934

.000

.578

Group*pre-EU Scores

20.504

1

20.504

.169

.682

.002

Error

9369.558

78

120.123

 

 

 

Total

306603

81

 

 

 

 

Research Question: Are there significant mean differences between experimental and control group students with respect to their environmental concerns?

To test this hypothesis for 6th and 8th grade students, independent samples t-tests were conducted. The results of t-test analyses run for students’ environmental concerns are summarized in Table 6. The results of the analysis revealed that there are significant mean differences between mean scores of 6th grade students (t(115) = 2.189, p = .031, η2 = .04) and 8th grade students (t(79) = 6.026, p = .000, η2 = .31) enrolling eco-school application and students enrolling traditional school. For both of the grade levels, eco-school students got higher scores than control group students.

Table 6 Results of t-test Analysis Run for 6th Grade Students’ Environmental Concerns

Group

Group

N

M

SD

t

p

6th grade

EG

70

32.257

9.690

2.189

.031

CG

47

27.914

11.648

8th grade

EG

41

38.170

5.444

6.026

.000

CG

40

29.275

7.632

A one-way analysis of covariance is conducted to compare the effectiveness of treatments on 7th grade students’ environmental concerns. Results of analysis revealed that there are no significant differences between treatment groups with respect to their environmental concern scores (F(1,115) = 2.308, p = .131). Table 7 summarizes the ANCOVA results run for the effects of treatments on 7th grade students’ environmental concerns.

Table 7 ANCOVA Summary for 7th Grade Students’ Environmental Concern Scores

Source

SS

Df

MS

F

p

Partial Eta Squared (η2)

Covariate

(pre-EC Scores)

491.500

1

491.500

6.602

.011

.054

Group

171.843

1

171.843

2.308

.131

.020

Group*pre-EC Scores

14.903

1

14.903

.199

.657

.001

Error

8561.688

115

74.449

 

 

 

Total

124776

118

 

 

 

 

 


Copyright (C) 2012 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 13, Issue 2, Article 3 (Dec., 2012). All Rights Reserved.