Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 13, Issue 2, Article 5 (Dec., 2012)
Lale CERRAH ÖZSEVGEÇ, Hüseyin ARTUN and Melike ÜNAL
The effects of Swedish Knife Model on students’ understanding of the digestive system

Previous Contents


References

Akamca, GÖ. & Hamurcu, H. (2009). Scıence and technology educatıon based on analogıes, concept cartoons and predıct-observe-explaın technıques. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 4, 1186–1206.

Cerrah, ÖL. (2007). Effect of the active participated material development process on rectifying biology student teachers’ knowledge deficiencies and misconceptions. Master Thesis, KTU, Trabzon.

Aydin, S., Nurdane, A., Boz, Y., Dindar, AC. & Bektas, O. (2009). The contribution of constructivist ınstruction accompanied by concept mapping in enhancing pre-service chemistry teachers’ conceptual understanding of chemistry in the laboratory course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 518–534.

Bahar, M., Johnstone AH. & Hansell, MHN. (1999). Revisiting learning difficulties in biology. Journal of Biology Education, 33, 84–86.

Cakıcı, Y. (2005). Exploring Turkish upper primary level pupils’ understanding of digestion. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 79–100.

Carvalho, GS., Silva, R. & Clément, P. (2007). Historical analysis of Prtuguese primary school textbooks (1920–2005) on the topic of digestion. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 173–193.

Cerrah, ÖL. & Urey, M. (2010). The knowledge levels of preservice elementary teachers relating science knowledge to daily life. 9th National Science and Mathematics Education Symposium, Izmir, Turkey.

China, C. & Teou, LY. (2009). Using concept cartoons in formative assessment: scaffolding students’ argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 1307–1332.

Coll, RK. (2005). The role of models/and analogies in science education: ımplications from research. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 183–198.

Cuthbert, A. (2000). Do children have a holistic view of their internal body maps? School Science Review, 82, 25–32.

Çalik, M., Okur, M. & Taylor, N. (2011). A comparison of different conceptual change pedagogies employed within the topic of ‘‘sound propagation’’. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 729–742.

Dalkıran, G., Kesercioğlu, T. & Boyacı, S. (2005). The effects of concept maps and conceptual change text on the attitues of the students to science lesson. 14th International Education Symposium, Denizli, Turkey.

Dikmenli, M. (2010). Misconceptions of cell division held by student teachers in biology: a drawing analysis. Scientific Research and Essay, 5, 235–247.

Garcia- Barros, S., Martiinez-Losada, C. & Garrido, M. (2011). What do children aged four to seven know about the digestive system and the respiratory system of the human being and of other animals? International Journal of Science Education, 33, 2095–2122.

Güngör, B. & Özgür, S. (2009). The causes of the fifth grade students misconceptions originated from didactic about digestive system. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 149–177.

Hake, RR. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: a six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for ıntroductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64–74.

Hazel, F. & Prosser, M. (1994). First- year university students’ understanding of photosynthesis, their study strategies and learning concetx. The American Bioloogy Teacher, 56, 274–279.

Heywood, D. (2002). The place of analogies in science education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32, 233–247.

Jaakkola, RA. & Slaughter, V. (2002). Children body knowledge: understanding “life” as a biological goal. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 325–342.

Keppens, J. & Hay, D. (2008). Concept map assessment for teaching computer programming. Computer Science Education, 18, 31–42.

Kurnaz, AM. & Çalik, M. (2008). Using different conceptual change methods embedded within the 5E Model: A sample teaching for heat and temperature. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 5, 3–11.

Lock, R. & Richards, B. (1996). Plant and animal organs and functions-a student-centered approach. Journal of Biological Education, 30, 15–17.

Özkan, Ö., Tekkaya, C. & Geban, Ö. (2004). Faciliating conceptual change in students’ understanding of ecological concepts. Journal of Science Education and Teachnology, 13, 95–105.

Prokop, P. & Fanèovièová, J. (2006). Students ıdeas about the human body: do they really draw what they know? Journal of Baltic Science Education, 2, 86–95.

Reis, JM. & Tunnicliffe, SD. (2001). Students’ understanding of human organs and organ systems. Research in Science Education, 31, 383–399.

Reiss, MJ., Tunnicliffe, SD., Andersen, AM., Bartoszeck, A., Carvalho, GS., Chen, SY., Jarman, R., Jónsson, S., Manokore, V., Marchenko, N., Mulemwa, J., Novikova, T., Otuka, J., Teppa, S. & Rooy, WV. (2002). An international study of young peoples’ drawings of what is inside themselves. Journal of Biological Education, 36, 58–64.

Rule, AC. & Furletti, C. (2004). Using form and function analogy object boxes to teach human body systems. School Science and Mathematics, 104, 155–69.

Saka, A., Cerrah L., Akdeniz AR. & Ayas, A. (2006). A cross-age study of the understanding of three genetic concepts: how do they image the gene, dna and chromosome? Journal of Science Technology Education, 15, 192–201.

Sanders, M. (1993). Erronous ıdeas about respiration: the teacher factor. Journal of Research Science Teaching, 30, 111–126.

Sanders, M. & Cramer, F. (1992). Matric biology puppils’ ıdeas about respiration: ımplication for science educators. South African Journal of Science, 88, 543–548.

Sewell, A. (2002). Constructivism and student misconceptions. Australian Science Teaching Journal, 48, 24–28.

Solomom, PE., Berg, LR., Martin, WD. & Villee, C. (1993). Biology, Third Edition, Saunders College Publishing, America.

Soyibo, KM. & Evans, HG. (2002). Effects of a cooperative learning strategy on nineth graders’ understanding of human nutrition. Australian Science Teaching Journal, 48, 32–35.

Teixeira, MF. (2000). What happens to the food we eat? children’s conceptions of the structure and function of the digestive system. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 507–520.

Tekkaya, C. (2002). Misconceptions as barrier to understanding biology. Hacettepe University Education Journal, 23, 259–266.

Toyoma, N. (2000). What are food and air like inside our bodies? children’s thinking about digestion and respiration. International Journal of Behavior Development,24, 220–230.

 


Copyright (C) 2012 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 13, Issue 2, Article 5 (Dec., 2012). All Rights Reserved.