Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 12, Issue 2, Article 13 (Dec., 2011)
Oktay AKBAŞ and Hüseyin Miraç PEKTAŞ
The effects of using an interactive whiteboard on the academic achievement of university students

Previous Contents


References

Akpinar, E., Aktamis, H. & Ergin, Ö. (2005). Fen bilgisi dersinde egitim teknolojisi kullanilmasina iliskin ögrenci görüsleri. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(1), 93-100.

Ayas, A., Köse, S. & Tas, E. (2002). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on misconceptions about photosynthesis. The First International Education Conference, Changing Times Changing Needs, Gazimagusa, Northern Cyprus.

Baser, M. (2006). Effects of conceptual change and traditional confirmatory simulations on pre-service teachers' understanding of direct current circuits. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(5–6), 367–381.

Beauchamp, G. & Perkinson, J. (2005). Beyond the ‘wow’ factor: developing interactivity with the interactive whiteboard. School Science Review, 86 (316), 97-103.

Becta (2003). What the research says about interactive whiteboard? http://www.virtuallearning.org.uk/2003research/Becta_research_paper.pdf [retrieved from 02/08/2009].

Beeland, W., D. (2001). Student engagement, visual learning and technology: can interactive whiteboards help? http://teach.valdosta.edu/are/Artmanscrpt/vol1no1/beeland_am.pdf [retrieved from 02/08/2009].

Browning, M. E. & Lehmen, J. D. (1988). Identification and students’ misconception in genetic problem solving via computer program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(9), 747-761.

Büyüköztürk, S. (2004). Deneysel Desenler. Öntest-Sontest Kontrol Grubu Desen ve Veri Analizi. Pegem A Yayincilik.

Chambers, K. S. & Andre, T. (1997). Gender, prior knowledge, interest, and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 107-123.

Cuthell, P., J. (2003). Interactive whiteboards: new tools, new pedagogies, new learning? http://www.virtuallearning.org.uk/changemanage/iwb/Views%20from%20practitioners.pdf [retrieved from 02/08/2009].

Çallica, H., Erol, M., Sezgin, G. & Kavcar, N. (2001) Ilkögretim kurumlarinda laboratuar uygulamalarina iliskin bir çalisma. IV. Fen Bilimleri Egitimi Kongresi 2000, Bildiler Kitabi, 217-219. Ankara: Milli Egitim Basimevi.

Çepni, S. Tas, E. & Köse, S. (2006). The effects of computer-assisted material on students’ cognitive levels, misconceptions and attitudes towards science. Computers & Education, 46(2), 192–205.

Çömek, A. & Bayram, H. (2004). Fen bilgisi ögretiminde isi konusunun bilgisayar destekli ögretim materyalleri ile ögretilmesi. VI Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Egitimi Kongresi. Cilt: I, Istanbul, 192-197.

Demircioglu, H. & Geban, Ö. (1996). Fen bilgisi ögretiminde bilgisayar destekli ögretim ve geleneksel problem çözme etkinliklerinin ders basarisi bakimindan karsilastirilmasi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12, 183- 185.

Ergün, M. & Özdas, A. (1997). Ögretim Ilke ve Yöntemleri. Istanbul: Kaya Matbaacilik.

Güler, M. H. & Saglam, N. (2002). Biyoloji ögretiminde bilgisayar destekli ögretimin ve çalisma yapraklarinin ögrencilerin basarisi ve bilgisayara karsi tutumlarina etkileri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 117-126.

Gürdal, A. (1997). Fen egitiminde laboratuarin basariya etkisi. Yasadikça Egitim Dergisi, 55, 14-19.

Güven, L. & Gürdal, A. (2002). Ortaögretim fizik derslerinde deneylerin ögrenme üzerindeki etkileri. V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Egitimi Kongresi, ODTÜ, Ankara.

Güzel, H. (2000). Ilkögretim okullarinda I. ve II. kademedeki fen bilgisi derslerinde laboratuar etkinlikleri ve araç kullanimi düzeyi, IV. Congress Of Science Education’ 2000, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.

Hall, I. & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students’ perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 21, 102–117.

Kara, Y. & Yesilyurt, S. (2007). Assessing the effects of tutorial and edutainment software programs on students’ achievements, misconceptions and attitudes towards biology. Asia-Pacific Forum On Science Learning And Teaching, 8(2), 1-20.

Kayatürk, N. Geban, Ö. & Önal, A. (1995). Genel lise programinda yer alan kimya konulariyla ilgili derslerin müfredatlarinin incelenmesi ve ders geçme sisteminin incelenmesi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi 11, 9-13.

Klammer, S.,R., Newman, M., W., Farrell,R., Bilezikjiann, M. & Landay, J., A., (2001). The Designers Outpost: A Tangmble Interface for Collarative Web Site Design. Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=502350 [retrieved from 02/08/2009].

Köse, S., Gezer, K., Bilen, K. & Gencer, A. (2007). Bilgisayar destekli ögretim materyalinin canlilarin siniflandirilmasi konusunda ögrencilerin basari düzeyine ve bilgisayara yönelik tutumlarina etkisi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (23), 287-298.

McKagan, B. S., Handley, W., Perkins, K. & Wieman, C. (2009). “A Research-Based curriculum for teaching the photoelectric effect.” American Journal of Physics, 77(1), 87-94.

Miller, D., Glover, D. & Averis, D. (2005). Presentation and pedagogy: the effective use of interactive whiteboards in mathematics lessons, in D. Hewitt and A. Noyes (Eds), Proceedings of the sixth British Congress of Mathematics Education held at the University of Warwick, 105- 112.

Park, H., Khan, S. & Petrina, S. (2008). Ict in science education: a quasi-experimental study of achievement, attitudes toward science, and career aspirations of korean middle school students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(8), 993-1012.

Pektas, H. M., Çelik, H., Katranci, M. & Köse, S. (2009). 5. Siniflarda ses ve isik ünitesinin ögretiminde bilgisayar destekli ögretimin ögrenci basarisina etkisi. Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi, 17 (2), 649-658.

Perkins, K., Adams, W., Finkelstein, N. & digerleri. (2004). The physics education technology project: a new suite of physics simulations. Poster Presented at AAPT Summer Meeting.

Perkins, K., Adams, W., Dubson, M. & digerleri. (2006). Interactive simulations for teaching and learning physics. The Physics Teacher, 44(1), 18-23.

Reed, B. (1986). The effects of computer assisted instruction on achievement and attitudes of underachievers in high school biology. Dissertation Abstract International, 47(4).

Sencar, S., Yilmaz, E.E. & Eryilmaz, A. (2001). High School Students’ Misconceptions About Simple Electric Circuits. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21,113-120.

Sencar, S. & Eryilmaz, A. (2004). Factors mediating the effect of gender on ninth-grade turkish students’ misconceptions concering electric circuits. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 603-616.

Shepardson, P. D. & Moje, B. E. (1994). The nature of fourth graders’ understandings of electric circuits. Science Education, 78(5), 489-514.

Shipstone, D. (1998). Children’s ideas in science. chapter:3, electricity in simple circuits (Edited: Rosalind Driver). St Edmundsbury Pres Ltd., 32-51.

Smith, F., Hardman, F. & Higgins, S. (2006). The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher–pupil interaction in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 443–457.

Smith, H., Higgins, S., Wall, K. & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 91–101.

Tas, E., Köse, S. & Çepni, S. (2006). The effects of computer-assisted instruction material on understanding photosynthesis subject. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 1(2), 163-171.

Üce, M., Özkaya, A.R. & Sahin, M. (2001). Kimya Egitimi. IV. Fen Bilimleri Egitimi Kongresi 2000, Bildiler Kitabi, 437-439. Milli Egitim Basimevi, Ankara.

Wall, K., Higgins, S. & Smith, H. (2005). The visual helps me understand the complicated things’: pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 851–867.

Wieman, C. & Perkins, K. (2006). A powerful tool for teaching science. Nature Physics, 2, 290-292.

Wieman, C., Adams, W., Loeblein, P. & Perkins, K. (2010). Teaching Physics using PhET Simulations. The Physics Teacher, 48(4), 225.

Yenice, N. (2003). Bilgisayar destekli fen bilgisi ögretiminin ögrencilerin fen ve bilgisayara yönelik tutumlarina etkisi. The Turkish OnLine Journal of Educational Technology, 2(4), 79-84.

Yenice, N., Sümer, S., Oktaylar, H., C. & Erbil, E. (2003). Fen bilgisi derslerinde bilgisayar destekli ögretimin dersin hedeflerine ulasma düzeyine etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24, 152-158.

Yildirim, H. I., Yalçin, N., Sensoy, Ö. & Akçay, S. (2008). Ilkögretim 6., 7. ve 8. Sinif ögrencilerinin elektrik akimi konusunda sahip olduklari kavram yanilgilari. Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi, 16(11), 67-82.

 


Copyright (C) 2011 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 12, Issue 2, Article 13 (Dec., 2011). All Rights Reserved.