Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 12, Issue 1, Article 1 (Jun., 2011)
Nelofer HALAI and Manzoor Ali KHAN
Developing pedagogical content knowledge of science teachers through action research: A case study from Pakistan

Previous Contents Next


References

Aga Khan University, Institute for Educational Development (AKU-IED). (2011). Vision and Mission. (http://www.aku.edu/ied/aboutus/mission.shtml). Retrieved on February 10, 2011.

Aga Khan University, Institute for Educational Development (AKU-IED). (2009, June). Dissertation Guide for M.Ed. Class of 2010. Author.

Aga Khan University-Examination Board (AKU-EB). (2004). Secondary school certificate examination syllabus: Physics classes IX-X. Karachi: Aga Khan University Examination Board.

Altrichter, H., Feldman, A., Posch, P & Somekh, B. (2008). Teachers investigate their own work: An introduction to action research across the professions (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

Appleton, K. (2008). Developing science pedagogical content knowledge through mentoring elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19, 523-545.

Ashraf, H. & Rarieya, J. F. A. (2008). Teacher development through reflective conversations – possibilities and tensions: A Pakistan case. Reflective Practice, 9(3), 269-279.

Bergendahl, V. C. B. (2003). Action research as a means of professional development: Reflections on research and action in university chemistry education. Journal of In-service Education, 29(3), 363-374.

Bucat, R. (2004). Pedagogical content knowledge as a way forward: Applied research in chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5(3), 215-228.

Carlton, K. (2000). Teaching about heat and temperature. Physics Education, 35, 101.

Carlsen, W. S. (1999). Domains of teacher knowledge. In N. G. Lederman and J. Gess-Newsome (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 133-144). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.

Cochran-Smith, M. & S. Lytle. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.

Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A. & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 263-272.

Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Fernandez-Balboa, J. –M., & Stiehl, J. (1995). The generic nature of pedagogical content knowledge among college professors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 293- 306.

Gess-Newsome, J. & Lederman, N. (1999). Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implication for science education. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Goodnough, K. (2008). Moving science off the “back burner”: Meaning making within an action community of practice. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(1), 15-39.

Goswami, D & Stillman, P. (1987). Reclaiming the classroom: Teacher research as an agency for change. New Jersey: Boynton/Cook Publishers.

Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.

Grossman, P. L. (2005). Research on pedagogical approaches in teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Review of research in teacher education. Washington D. C.: American Educational Research Association.

Grundy, S. (1994). Action research at the school level: Possibilities and problems. Educational Action Research, 2(1), 23-37.

Halai, A. (2004). Action research to study classroom impact: Is it possible? Educational Action Research, 12(4), 515-534.

Halai, N. (2006a). Reconceptualising the professional development of inservice science teachers in Pakistan. In J. Earnest, & D. Treagust (Eds.), Education Rebuilding in Societies in Transition: International Perspectives (pp. 163- 176). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publications.

Halai, N. (2006b). Learning to use innovative pedagogy: The experience of a primary science teacher. Science Education International, 17(2), 123-132.

Halai, N. (2008). Curriculum reform in science education in Pakistan. In R. Coll, Education in Context: An International Perspective of the Influence of Context on Science Curriculum Development, Implementation and the Student-Experienced Curriculum. Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Hammersley, M. (2004). Action research: A contradiction in terms? Oxford Review of Education 30(2), 165-181.

Higher Education Commission (HEC) (2010). Curriculum of Education: B. Ed. (hons.) 4 year degree program. Curriculum division, HEC: Islamabad, Pakistan.
[Online] http://www.hec.gov.pk/InsideHEC/Divisions/AECA/CurriculumRevision/Pages/ApprovedCurriculam.aspx

Hung, W. (2009). Enhancing pedagogical content knowledge in elementary science. Teaching Education, 20(3), 229-242.

Institute for Educational Development (IED). (1994). Some notes on The Institute for Educational Development (IED) and its future development. Karachi, Pakistan: Author

Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Retallick, J. (2004). The Action Research Planner (2nd ed. revised). Aga Khan University, Institute for Educational Development, Karachi.

Khan, A. M. (2009). Understanding how the inquiry strategy works in a physics classroom at secondary level in a Pakistani private school context. Unpublished master’s thesis, The Aga Khan University, Institute for Educational Development, Pakistan.

Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2, 34-46.

Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal of Teacher Education. 41, 3-11.

Miles, B. M. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd Ed. ). London: Sage.

Mulhall, P., Berry, A. & Loughran, J. (2003). Our representations of science teachers’ topic specific PCK. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 4(2). [Online] http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/download/v4_issue2_files/mulhall.pdf

Mustafa, B. & Omer, G. (2007). Effectiveness of conceptual change instruction on understanding of heat and temperature concepts. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(1), 115-133.

National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). (2000). NSTA position paper: The nature of science. [Online] http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/natureofscience.aspx. Retrieved on October 27, 2009.

Nilsson, P. (2008). Teaching for understanding: The complex nature of pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1281-1299.

Novak, J. D. (1993). How do we learn our lessons? The Science Teacher, 60(3), 50–55.

Pardhan, H. (2005). Action research for female science teacher development: Case Pakistan. European Journal of Scientific Research, 6(1), 46-64.

Park, S & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the Conceptualisation of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): PCK as a Conceptual Tool. Research in Science, 38(3), 261–284.

Pathare, S. R. & Pradhan, H. C. (2010). Students’ misconceptions about heat transfer mechanisms and elementary kinetic theory. Physics Education, 45, 629.

Peters, J. (2004). Teachers engaging in action research: Challenging some assumptions. Educational Action Research, 12(4), 535-556.

Ponte, P., Ax, J., Beijaard, D. & Wubbels, T. (2004). Teachers’ development of professional knowledge through action research and the facilitation of this by teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 571-588.

Ponte, P. Beijaard, D. & Ax, J. (2004). Don’t wait till the cows come home: action research and initial teacher education in three different countries. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 10(6), 591-621.

Pedretti, E. & Hodson, D.( 1995). From rhetoric to action: Implementing STS education through action research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(5), 463-485.

Radford, M. (2007). Action research and the challenge of complexity. Cambridge Journal of Education, 37(2), 263-278.

Reason, P., and H. Bradbury. (2001). Handbook of action research. London: Sage.

Retallick, J. & Mithani, S. (2003). The impact of a professional development program: A study from Pakistan. Journal of In-service Education, 29(3), 405-422.

Robinson, M. (2009). Practitioner inquiry in South Africa schools: what, how and why (not). Educational Action Research, 17(1), 121-131.

Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.

Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

Somekh, B. & Zeichner, K. (2009). Action research for educational reform: remodelling action research theories and practices in local contexts. Educational Action Research, 17(1), 5- 21.

Soonye, P. & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38, 261-284.

Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.

Van Driel, J. H., Jong, O. D., and Verloop, N. (2002). The development of preservice chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 86, 572-590.

Zeichner, K. M. & Liston, D. P. (1987). Teaching student teachers to reflect. Harvard Education Review, 57(1), 23-48.

 


Copyright (C) 2011 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 12, Issue 1, Article 1 (Jun., 2011). All Rights Reserved.