Page 26 -
P. 26

Leadership at the school level

ISLDN researchers have conducted two          attempting to alter the school? vision
types of case studies of school leaders       and culture. This included developing
across a variety of national contexts.        an integrated intervention plan using
First, they have observed and                 comprehensive data collection and
interviewed principals and teachers,          decision-making processes (Drysdale,
capturing snapshots of the leadership         Gurr, & Villalobos, 2012), being
strategies principals are using in high-      organized and planning thoughtfully
need, low-performing schools in               (Notman, 2012), and constantly
urban, suburban, and rural                    clarifying and communicating desired
communities. Second, one of the               values and performance expectations
studies followed a turnaround leader          (Gu & Johansson, 2012; Hipp & Baran,
over three years, capturing the               2013). Teachers who were unable or
dynamic nature of conditions over             unwilling to meet new performance
time. Both of these types of studies          expectations were relocated to other
have revealed important information           schools (Wildy & Clarke, 2012). In
about the realities of turnaround             some instances, improving the school?
leadership in high-need schools.              grounds and facilities gave
                                              communities a renewed sense of hope
The short-term case studies                   that a more productive school learning
demonstrated the strategies principals        environment would affect their
used to confront challenging aspects          children (Bryant & Sharvashidze,
of their schools, including low staff         2013).
morale; poor student academic
performance, attendance, and                  Second, realizing the importance of
graduation; high mobility rates of            human potential to effect change,
students and teachers; and community          principals developed the expertise and
apathy. Principals intervened at              capacity of teachers and other campus
different levels, oftentimes using            leaders (Notman, 2012), This occurred
multiple strategies simultaneously.           by investing in external leadership
First, they took a macro view by              development programs, ensuring

                                          20
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31